Motorola Razr 40 vs Samsung Galaxy C55
The Motorola Razr 40 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, while the Samsung Galaxy C55 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 40 leads — 56/100 vs 55/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy C55 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4200); the main camera is 64 MP vs 50 MP.
Motorola Razr 40
Samsung Galaxy C55
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Better camera (50/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (91/100 vs 79/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4200 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 30W
- Lighter: 180g vs 188g
- Longer battery life (48/100 vs 34/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 40 vs the Samsung Galaxy C55, the Motorola Razr 40 scores 1 points higher (56/100 vs 55/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy C55 leads (48/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100. In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 40 is a bit better (91/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 40 is a bit better (50/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy C55 is a bit better (48/100 vs 34/100). In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 73/100.
| Specification | Motorola Razr 40 | Samsung Galaxy C55 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 840330 | 840330 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1039 | 1039 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2885 | 2885 | |
| Display | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.7" Super AMOLED+ | |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4200 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 5W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 14, One UI 6.1 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | 1000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 170.8×74.0×7.4 mm | 163.9×76.5×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 180 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Motorola Razr 40
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy C55
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 50MP
Motorola Razr 40
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2640
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy C55
- 6.7" Super AMOLED+
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 40
- 4200 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless: 5W
Samsung Galaxy C55
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
We compared Motorola Razr 40 and Samsung Galaxy C55, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 40 is a bit better (91/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 40 is a bit better (50/100 vs 44/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy C55 is a bit better (48/100 vs 34/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 73/100.
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 40 or the Samsung Galaxy C55?
The Motorola Razr 40 edges out the Samsung Galaxy C55 by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 40 and the Samsung Galaxy C55?
The Motorola Razr 40 has a MobileRank rating of 56/100, the Samsung Galaxy C55 — 55/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 40 or the Samsung Galaxy C55?
The Motorola Razr 40 leads on camera score (50/100 vs 44/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 40 over the Samsung Galaxy C55?
The Motorola Razr 40 is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy C55 is a better fit for everyday use.