Motorola Razr 40 vs Nubia Flip
The Motorola Razr 40 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, while the Nubia Flip (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 40 leads — 56/100 vs 49/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Nubia Flip has the bigger battery (4310 mAh vs 4200); the main camera is 64 MP vs 50 MP; the Motorola Razr 40 is noticeably lighter (188g vs 214g).
Motorola Razr 40
Nubia Flip
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 188g vs 214g
- Better camera (50/100 vs 32/100)
- Longer battery life (34/100 vs 31/100)
- Better display (91/100 vs 83/100)
- Better portability (73/100 vs 61/100)
- Bigger battery: 4310 vs 4200 mAh
- Faster charging: 33W vs 30W
- Overall rating 49/100
Comparing the Motorola Razr 40 vs the Nubia Flip, the Motorola Razr 40 scores 7 points higher (56/100 vs 49/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 40 leads (50/100 vs 32/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100. In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 40 is a bit better (91/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 40 notably outperforms the Nubia Flip (50/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 40 and the Nubia Flip are nearly equal (34/100 vs 31/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 40 is a bit better (73/100 vs 61/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 40 | Nubia Flip | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 840330 | 840330 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1039 | 1039 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2885 | 2885 | |
| Display | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.9" Foldable OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1188x2790 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4200 mAh | 4310 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 33W | |
| Wireless charging | 5W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 13 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 170.8×74.0×7.4 mm | 170.0×75.5×7.0 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 214 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Motorola Razr 40
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
Nubia Flip
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 16MP
Motorola Razr 40
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2640
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Nubia Flip
- 6.9" Foldable OLED
- Resolution: 1188x2790
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 40
- 4200 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless: 5W
Nubia Flip
- 4310 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
We compared Motorola Razr 40 and Nubia Flip, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 40 is a bit better (91/100 vs 83/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 40 notably outperforms the Nubia Flip (50/100 vs 32/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 40 and the Nubia Flip are nearly equal (34/100 vs 31/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 40 is a bit better (73/100 vs 61/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 40 or the Nubia Flip?
The Motorola Razr 40 edges out the Nubia Flip by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 40 and the Nubia Flip?
The Motorola Razr 40 has a MobileRank rating of 56/100, the Nubia Flip — 49/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 40 or the Nubia Flip?
The Motorola Razr 40 leads on camera score (50/100 vs 32/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 40 over the Nubia Flip?
The Motorola Razr 40 is a better fit for everyday use. The Nubia Flip is a better fit for everyday use.