Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Vivo Y77 (China)
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, while the Vivo Y77 (China) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 930. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra leads — 32/100 vs 29/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y77 (China) has the bigger battery (4500 mAh vs 3800); the main camera is 12 MP vs 50 MP; the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y77 (China) doesn't; the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is thinner (7.0mm vs 8.6mm).
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Vivo Y77 (China)
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 184g vs 194g
- Higher performance (22/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (70/100 vs 57/100)
- Better value for money (65/100 vs 55/100)
- Bigger battery: 4500 vs 3800 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 30W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 12MP
- Better camera (24/100 vs 14/100)
- Longer battery life (39/100 vs 10/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs the Vivo Y77 (China), the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra scores 3 points higher (32/100 vs 29/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra leads (22/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) leads (24/100 vs 14/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) leads (39/100 vs 10/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra leads (65/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (22/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) is a bit better (24/100 vs 14/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (39/100 vs 10/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a bit better (70/100 vs 57/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a bit better (65/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 40 Ultra | Vivo Y77 (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | MediaTek Dimensity 930 | |
| AnTuTu | 1425446 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 1761 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4688 | — | |
| Display | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1080x2388 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3800 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 5W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 12, Origin OS Ocean | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 170.8×74.0×7.0 mm | 164.2×75.8×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 184 g | 194 g | |
| Price | $648 | — |
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
- Main: 12MP f/f/1.5
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo Y77 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2640
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Vivo Y77 (China)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
- 3800 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless: 5W
Vivo Y77 (China)
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y77 (China)
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (22/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) is a bit better (24/100 vs 14/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (39/100 vs 10/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a bit better (70/100 vs 57/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a bit better (65/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Vivo Y77 (China)?
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra edges out the Vivo Y77 (China) by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and the Vivo Y77 (China)?
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 32/100, the Vivo Y77 (China) — 29/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Vivo Y77 (China)?
The Vivo Y77 (China) leads on camera score (24/100 vs 14/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Vivo Y77 (China)?
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra leads on performance (22/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra over the Vivo Y77 (China)?
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo Y77 (China) is a better fit for everyday use.