Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Vivo Y32t

The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra leads — 32/100 vs 11/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y32t has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 3800); the main camera is 12 MP vs 13 MP; the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y32t doesn't; the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is thinner (7.0mm vs 8.3mm).

The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t by 21 points (32/100 vs 11/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
Performance 22
Display 100
Camera 14
Battery 10
Design 70
Value for money 65
Vivo Y32t
Performance 0
Display 0
Camera 0
Battery 36
Design 76
Value for money 55
What makes Motorola Razr 40 Ultra better?

  • Higher performance (22/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better camera (14/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better value for money (65/100 vs 55/100)
What makes Vivo Y32t better?
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 3800 mAh
  • Better main camera: 13MP vs 12MP
  • Lighter: 179g vs 184g

  • Longer battery life (36/100 vs 10/100)
  • Better design/ergonomics (76/100 vs 70/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs the Vivo Y32t, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra scores 21 points higher (32/100 vs 11/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra leads (22/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra leads (14/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t leads (36/100 vs 10/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra leads (65/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (22/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a bit better (14/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (36/100 vs 10/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (76/100 vs 70/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a bit better (65/100 vs 55/100).

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra: The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo Y32t: The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Vivo Y32t
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 MediaTek Helio P70 ()
AnTuTu 1425446
Geekbench Single 1761
Geekbench Multi 4688
Display 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED 6.5" LCD IPS
Resolution 1080x2640 720x1600
Refresh rate 165 Hz
Battery 3800 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 30W
Wireless charging 5W 0W
Main camera 12 MP 13 MP
Ultrawide 13 MP 0 MP
Front camera 32 MP 8 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades Android 11 Red Velvet Cake
Brightness (peak) 1400 nits
NFC yes no
Dimensions 170.8×74.0×7.0 mm 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm
Weight 184 g 179 g
Price $648
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
  • Main: 12MP f/f/1.5
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Front: 32MP
14
camera
Vivo Y32t
  • Main: 13MP
  • Front: 8MP
0
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
  • 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2640
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
100
display
Vivo Y32t
  • 6.5" LCD IPS
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: —
0
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
  • 3800 mAh
  • Wired: 30W
  • Wireless: 5W
10
battery
Vivo Y32t
  • 5000 mAh
  • No wireless charging
36
battery
Benchmarks
Price and availability
Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
$648
Vivo Y32t
Price unknown
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (22/100 vs 0/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (100/100 vs 0/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a bit better (14/100 vs 0/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra (36/100 vs 10/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (76/100 vs 70/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a bit better (65/100 vs 55/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Vivo Y32t?

The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t by 21 points (32/100 vs 11/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra and the Vivo Y32t?

The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 32/100, the Vivo Y32t — 11/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Vivo Y32t?

The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra leads on camera score (14/100 vs 0/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra or the Vivo Y32t?

The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra leads on performance (22/100 vs 0/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra over the Vivo Y32t?

The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use.