Motorola Moto G8 Plus vs Redmi Note 8T
The Motorola Moto G8 Plus (2019) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, while the Redmi Note 8T (2019) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Moto G8 Plus leads — 34/100 vs 28/100 (a 6-point difference).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Redmi Note 8T
What makes Motorola Moto G8 Plus better?
- Lighter: 188g vs 190g
- Better camera (40/100 vs 30/100)
- Better display (57/100 vs 32/100)
What makes Redmi Note 8T better?
- Longer battery life (25/100 vs 22/100)
- Better portability (59/100 vs 55/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Moto G8 Plus vs the Redmi Note 8T, the Motorola Moto G8 Plus scores 6 points higher (34/100 vs 28/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Moto G8 Plus leads (40/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 24/100. In the "display" category, the Motorola Moto G8 Plus notably outperforms the Redmi Note 8T (57/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Moto G8 Plus is a bit better (40/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Note 8T and the Motorola Moto G8 Plus are nearly equal (25/100 vs 22/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 8T and the Motorola Moto G8 Plus are nearly equal (59/100 vs 55/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Moto G8 Plus | Redmi Note 8T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 | |
| AnTuTu | 329457 | 329457 | |
| Geekbench Single | 321 | 321 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1128 | 1128 | |
| Display | 6.3" LTPS IPS LCD | 6.3" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2280 | — | |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 4000 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | — | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 48 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 16 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 25 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 158.4×75.8×9.1 mm | 161.1×75.4×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 190 g | |
| Launch price | — | $200 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
- Main: 48MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 16MP
- Front: 25MP
Redmi Note 8T
- Main: 48MP
- Front: 13MP
Display comparison
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
- 6.3" LTPS IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2280
- Refresh rate: —
Redmi Note 8T
- 6.3" IPS LCD
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
Redmi Note 8T
- 4000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Moto G8 Plus and Redmi Note 8T, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 24/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Moto G8 Plus notably outperforms the Redmi Note 8T (57/100 vs 32/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Moto G8 Plus is a bit better (40/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi Note 8T and the Motorola Moto G8 Plus are nearly equal (25/100 vs 22/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 8T and the Motorola Moto G8 Plus are nearly equal (59/100 vs 55/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Moto G8 Plus or the Redmi Note 8T?
The Motorola Moto G8 Plus edges out the Redmi Note 8T by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G8 Plus and the Redmi Note 8T?
The Motorola Moto G8 Plus has a MobileRank rating of 34/100, the Redmi Note 8T — 28/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto G8 Plus or the Redmi Note 8T?
The Motorola Moto G8 Plus leads on camera score (40/100 vs 30/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Moto G8 Plus over the Redmi Note 8T?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is display — better on the Motorola Moto G8 Plus (57/100 vs 32/100).