Motorola Moto G67 Power vs Vivo X500 Pro

The Motorola Moto G67 Power (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, while the Vivo X500 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro; launch prices were $200 and $970. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X500 Pro leads — 90/100 vs 52/100 (a 38-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Moto G67 Power has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6510); the Vivo X500 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (5,016,623 vs 798,429); the Vivo X500 Pro is noticeably lighter (192g vs 210g).

The Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G67 Power by 38 points (90/100 vs 52/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Motorola Moto G67 Power

Performance 53
Display 66
Camera 40
Battery 57
Portability 47
Value for money 64

Vivo X500 Pro

Performance 100
Display 94
Camera 87
Battery 81
Portability 63
Value for money 92

What makes Motorola Moto G67 Power better?

  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6510 mAh
  • Cheaper at launch: $200 vs $970

  • Overall rating 52/100

What makes Vivo X500 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 5016623 vs 798429
  • Better Geekbench Single: 4188 vs 1015
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 13145 vs 2687
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 30W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 192g vs 210g

  • Higher performance (100/100 vs 53/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 40/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 57/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 66/100)
  • Better portability (63/100 vs 47/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Moto G67 Power vs the Vivo X500 Pro, the Vivo X500 Pro scores 38 points higher (90/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (100/100 vs 53/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (87/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (81/100 vs 57/100). Value score: Motorola Moto G67 Power — 64/100, Vivo X500 Pro — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G67 Power (100/100 vs 53/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G67 Power (94/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G67 Power (87/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G67 Power (81/100 vs 57/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X500 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G67 Power (63/100 vs 47/100).

Vivo X500 Pro: The Vivo X500 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Motorola Moto G67 Power Vivo X500 Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro
AnTuTu 798429 5016623
Geekbench Single 1015 4188
Geekbench Multi 2687 13145
Display 6.7" IPS LCD 6.4" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2400 1216x2660
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 7000 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 30W 90W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 64 MP
Front camera 32 MP 50 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 17
Brightness (peak) 1050 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP64 IP68/IP69
Dimensions 166.2×76.5×8.6 mm 151.8×71.9×8.1 mm
Weight 210 g 192 g
Launch price $200 $970

Camera comparison

Motorola Moto G67 Power

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 32MP
40
camera

Vivo X500 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 50MP
87
camera

Display comparison

Motorola Moto G67 Power

  • 6.7" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
66
display

Vivo X500 Pro

  • 6.4" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1216x2660
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Battery and charging

Motorola Moto G67 Power

  • 7000 mAh
  • Wired: 30W
  • No wireless charging
57
battery

Vivo X500 Pro

  • 6510 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Moto G67 Power and Vivo X500 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Moto G67 Power Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
52/100
798429 AnTuTu
Vivo X500 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro
90/100 +84.1%
5016623 AnTuTu

Vivo X500 Pro leads Motorola Moto G67 Power by 84.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Motorola Moto G67 Power

$200

Vivo X500 Pro

$970

Launch price difference: $770. Motorola Moto G67 Power was $770 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G67 Power (100/100 vs 53/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G67 Power (94/100 vs 66/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G67 Power (87/100 vs 40/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G67 Power (81/100 vs 57/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X500 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G67 Power (63/100 vs 47/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Motorola Moto G67 Power or the Vivo X500 Pro?

The Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G67 Power by 38 points (90/100 vs 52/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G67 Power and the Vivo X500 Pro?

The Motorola Moto G67 Power has a MobileRank rating of 52/100, the Vivo X500 Pro — 90/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto G67 Power or the Vivo X500 Pro?

The Vivo X500 Pro leads on camera score (87/100 vs 40/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Moto G67 Power or the Vivo X500 Pro?

The Vivo X500 Pro leads on performance (100/100 vs 53/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Moto G67 Power over the Vivo X500 Pro?

The Vivo X500 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.