Motorola Moto G55 vs Nothing Phone (4a)
The Motorola Moto G55 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7025, while the Nothing Phone (4a) (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4; estimated prices are $261 and $349. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nothing Phone (4a) leads — 39/100 vs 34/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Nothing Phone (4a) has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 5000).
Motorola Moto G55
Nothing Phone (4a)
- Lighter: 179g vs 190g
- Cheaper: $261 vs $349
- Better design/ergonomics (76/100 vs 62/100)
- Better value for money (92/100 vs 86/100)
- Bigger battery: 5200 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 30W
- Higher performance (9/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (37/100 vs 31/100)
- Longer battery life (48/100 vs 39/100)
Comparing the Motorola Moto G55 vs the Nothing Phone (4a), the Nothing Phone (4a) scores 5 points higher (39/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Nothing Phone (4a) is a bit better (9/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (4a) is a bit better (37/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Nothing Phone (4a) is a bit better (48/100 vs 39/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto G55 is a bit better (76/100 vs 62/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Moto G55 is a bit better (92/100 vs 86/100).
| Specification | Motorola Moto G55 | Nothing Phone (4a) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 1148725 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 1237 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 3281 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 2412x1080 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5200 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 45W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 161.6×73.8×8.1 mm | 164.0×77.6×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 179 g | 190 g | |
| Price | $261 | $349 |
Motorola Moto G55
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Nothing Phone (4a)
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Motorola Moto G55
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nothing Phone (4a)
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2412x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Moto G55
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- No wireless charging
Nothing Phone (4a)
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Price difference: $88. Motorola Moto G55 is cheaper by $88.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Nothing Phone (4a) is a bit better (9/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (4a) is a bit better (37/100 vs 31/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Nothing Phone (4a) is a bit better (48/100 vs 39/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto G55 is a bit better (76/100 vs 62/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Moto G55 is a bit better (92/100 vs 86/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Moto G55 or the Nothing Phone (4a)?
The Nothing Phone (4a) edges out the Motorola Moto G55 by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G55 and the Nothing Phone (4a)?
The Motorola Moto G55 has a MobileRank rating of 34/100, the Nothing Phone (4a) — 39/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto G55 or the Nothing Phone (4a)?
The Nothing Phone (4a) leads on camera score (37/100 vs 31/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Moto G55 or the Nothing Phone (4a)?
The Nothing Phone (4a) leads on performance (9/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Moto G55 over the Nothing Phone (4a)?
The Motorola Moto G55 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Nothing Phone (4a) is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.