Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) vs Vivo iQOO 15

The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, while the Vivo iQOO 15 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads — 86/100 vs 57/100 (a 29-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo iQOO 15 is faster in AnTuTu (3,740,528 vs 831,447); the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) is noticeably lighter (191g vs 215g).

The Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) by 29 points (86/100 vs 57/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025)
Performance 55
Display 83
Camera 42
Battery 61
Portability 61
Value for money
Vivo iQOO 15
Performance 94
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 85
Portability 48
Value for money 84
What makes Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) better?
  • Lighter: 191g vs 215g

  • Better portability (61/100 vs 48/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 15 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3740528 vs 831447
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1015
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 2920
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 68W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 55/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 42/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 61/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 83/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) vs the Vivo iQOO 15, the Vivo iQOO 15 scores 29 points higher (86/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (94/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (78/100 vs 42/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (85/100 vs 61/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) (94/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) (99/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) (78/100 vs 42/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) (85/100 vs 61/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) is a bit better (61/100 vs 48/100).

Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025): The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo iQOO 15: The Vivo iQOO 15 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) Vivo iQOO 15
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 831447 3740528
Geekbench Single 1015 3041
Geekbench Multi 2920 9494
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1220x2712 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 68W 100W
Wireless charging 15W 40W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 13 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades Android 16
Brightness (peak) 3000 nits 6000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 162.2×74.8×8.3 mm 163.7×76.8×8.1 mm
Weight 191 g 215 g
Launch price $599
Camera comparison
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025)
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Front: 32MP
42
camera
Vivo iQOO 15
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025)
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1220x2712
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
83
display
Vivo iQOO 15
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025)
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 15W
61
battery
Vivo iQOO 15
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 18:52 hrs, total 39:26 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) and Vivo iQOO 15, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
57/100
831447 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
86/100 +77.8%
3740528 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 leads Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) by 77.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025)
Price unknown
Vivo iQOO 15
$599
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) (94/100 vs 55/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) (99/100 vs 83/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) (78/100 vs 42/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) (85/100 vs 61/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) is a bit better (61/100 vs 48/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) by 29 points (86/100 vs 57/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) and the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) has a MobileRank rating of 57/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 — 86/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 42/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 leads on performance (94/100 vs 55/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) over the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO 15 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.