Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) vs Redmi Turbo 5

The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, while the Redmi Turbo 5 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra; estimated prices are $196 and $250. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads — 54/100 vs 36/100 (a 18-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Turbo 5 has the bigger battery (7560 mAh vs 5000); the Redmi Turbo 5 is faster in AnTuTu (2,809,170 vs 736,675).

The Redmi Turbo 5 is noticeably better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) — the overall rating gap is 18 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024)
Performance 0
Display 100
Camera 39
Battery 41
Design 62
Value for money 96
Redmi Turbo 5
Performance 43
Display 100
Camera 32
Battery 72
Design 45
Value for money 93
What makes Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) better?
  • Lighter: 190g vs 204g
  • Cheaper: $196 vs $250

  • Better camera (39/100 vs 32/100)
  • Better design/ergonomics (62/100 vs 45/100)
  • Better value for money (96/100 vs 93/100)
What makes Redmi Turbo 5 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 2809170 vs 736675
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1553 vs 935
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 6403 vs 2719
  • Bigger battery: 7560 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 30W

  • Higher performance (43/100 vs 0/100)
  • Longer battery life (72/100 vs 41/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) vs the Redmi Turbo 5, the Redmi Turbo 5 scores 18 points higher (54/100 vs 36/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads (43/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads (72/100 vs 41/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) (43/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) is a bit better (39/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) (72/100 vs 41/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (62/100 vs 45/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) and the Redmi Turbo 5 are nearly equal (96/100 vs 93/100).

Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024): The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Redmi Turbo 5: The Redmi Turbo 5 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) Redmi Turbo 5
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra
AnTuTu 736675 2809170
Geekbench Single 935 1553
Geekbench Multi 2719 6403
Display 6.7" P-OLED 6.6" AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2400 2756x1268
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 7560 mAh
Charging 30W 100W
Wireless charging 15W 0W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 13 MP 8 MP
Front camera 32 MP 20 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 14, up to 1 major Android upgrades Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1200 nits 3500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 162.6×74.8×8.3 mm 157.5×75.2×8.2 mm
Weight 190 g 204 g
Price $196 $250
Camera comparison
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024)
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Front: 32MP
39
camera
Redmi Turbo 5
  • Main: 50MP
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 20MP
32
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024)
  • 6.7" P-OLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Redmi Turbo 5
  • 6.6" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2756x1268
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024)
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 30W
  • Wireless: 15W
41
battery
Redmi Turbo 5
  • 7560 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
72
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) and Redmi Turbo 5, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
36/100
736675 AnTuTu
Redmi Turbo 5 MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra
54/100 +73.8%
2809170 AnTuTu

Redmi Turbo 5 leads Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) by 73.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024)
$196
Redmi Turbo 5
$250

Price difference: $54. Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) is cheaper by $54.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) (43/100 vs 0/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) is a bit better (39/100 vs 32/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) (72/100 vs 41/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (62/100 vs 45/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) and the Redmi Turbo 5 are nearly equal (96/100 vs 93/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) or the Redmi Turbo 5?

The Redmi Turbo 5 is noticeably better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) — the overall rating gap is 18 points.

What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) and the Redmi Turbo 5?

The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) has a MobileRank rating of 36/100, the Redmi Turbo 5 — 54/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) or the Redmi Turbo 5?

The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) leads on camera score (39/100 vs 32/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) or the Redmi Turbo 5?

The Redmi Turbo 5 leads on performance (43/100 vs 0/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) over the Redmi Turbo 5?

The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Redmi Turbo 5 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.