Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) vs Redmi K90

The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, while the Redmi K90 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $196 and $401. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi K90 leads — 68/100 vs 36/100 (a 32-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi K90 has the bigger battery (7100 mAh vs 5000); the Redmi K90 is faster in AnTuTu (3,088,357 vs 736,675); the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) is noticeably lighter (190g vs 206g).

The Redmi K90 significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) by 32 points (68/100 vs 36/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024)
Performance 0
Display 100
Camera 39
Battery 41
Design 62
Value for money 96
Redmi K90
Performance 69
Display 100
Camera 53
Battery 71
Design 42
Value for money 82
What makes Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) better?
  • Lighter: 190g vs 206g
  • Cheaper: $196 vs $401

  • Better design/ergonomics (62/100 vs 42/100)
  • Better value for money (96/100 vs 82/100)
What makes Redmi K90 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3088357 vs 736675
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3050 vs 935
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9300 vs 2719
  • Bigger battery: 7100 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 30W

  • Higher performance (69/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better camera (53/100 vs 39/100)
  • Longer battery life (71/100 vs 41/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) vs the Redmi K90, the Redmi K90 scores 32 points higher (68/100 vs 36/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 leads (69/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi K90 leads (53/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 leads (71/100 vs 41/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) leads (96/100 vs 82/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) (69/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Redmi K90 is a bit better (53/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) (71/100 vs 41/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) notably outperforms the Redmi K90 (62/100 vs 42/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) is a bit better (96/100 vs 82/100).

Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024): The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Redmi K90: The Redmi K90 is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) Redmi K90
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 736675 3088357
Geekbench Single 935 3050
Geekbench Multi 2719 9300
Display 6.7" P-OLED 6.6" AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2400 2510x1156
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 7100 mAh
Charging 30W 100W
Wireless charging 15W 0W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 13 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 20 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 14, up to 1 major Android upgrades Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1200 nits 3500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 162.6×74.8×8.3 mm 157.5×75.3×8.0 mm
Weight 190 g 206 g
Price $196 $401
Camera comparison
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024)
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Front: 32MP
39
camera
Redmi K90
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 20MP
53
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024)
  • 6.7" P-OLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Redmi K90
  • 6.6" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2510x1156
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024)
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 30W
  • Wireless: 15W
41
battery
Redmi K90
  • 7100 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
71
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) and Redmi K90, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
36/100
736675 AnTuTu
Redmi K90 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
68/100 +76.1%
3088357 AnTuTu

Redmi K90 leads Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) by 76.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024)
$196
Redmi K90
$401

Price difference: $205. Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) is cheaper by $205.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) (69/100 vs 0/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Redmi K90 is a bit better (53/100 vs 39/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) (71/100 vs 41/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) notably outperforms the Redmi K90 (62/100 vs 42/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) is a bit better (96/100 vs 82/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) or the Redmi K90?

The Redmi K90 significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) by 32 points (68/100 vs 36/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) and the Redmi K90?

The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) has a MobileRank rating of 36/100, the Redmi K90 — 68/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) or the Redmi K90?

The Redmi K90 leads on camera score (53/100 vs 39/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) or the Redmi K90?

The Redmi K90 leads on performance (69/100 vs 0/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) over the Redmi K90?

The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Redmi K90 is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers.