Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition

The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, while the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads — 71/100 vs 46/100 (a 25-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is faster in AnTuTu (1,294,871 vs 592,015).

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) by 25 points (71/100 vs 46/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022)

Performance 46
Display 66
Camera 35
Battery 52
Portability 36
Value for money —

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition

Performance 68
Display 80
Camera 86
Battery 56
Portability 52
Value for money —

What makes Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) better?


  • Overall rating 46/100

What makes ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 1294871 vs 592015
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1662 vs 905
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 4188 vs 2101
  • Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 204g vs 215g

  • Higher performance (68/100 vs 46/100)
  • Better camera (86/100 vs 35/100)
  • Longer battery life (56/100 vs 52/100)
  • Better display (80/100 vs 66/100)
  • Better portability (52/100 vs 36/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) vs the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition scores 25 points higher (71/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (68/100 vs 46/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (86/100 vs 35/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) (68/100 vs 46/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (80/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) (86/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition and the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) are nearly equal (56/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) (52/100 vs 36/100).

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition: The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.

Specs comparison

Specification Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
AnTuTu 592015 1294871
Geekbench Single 905 1662
Geekbench Multi 2101 4188
Display 6.8" IPS LCD 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2460 1116x2480
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging — 80W
Main camera 50 MP 64 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 64 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 64 MP
Front camera 16 MP 16 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 18GB
Storage 256GB 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 12 Android 12, MyOS 12
Brightness (peak) — 1500 nits
NFC yes yes
Dimensions 168.9×75.8×9.3 mm 163.3×73.6×8.4 mm
Weight 215 g 204 g
Launch price — —

Camera comparison

Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022)

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
35
camera

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition

  • Main: 64MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 64MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 16MP
86
camera

Display comparison

Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022)

  • 6.8" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2460
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
66
display

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1116x2480
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display

Battery and charging

Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022)

  • 5000 mAh
  • No wireless charging
52
battery

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
56
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
46/100
592015 AnTuTu
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
71/100 +54.3%
1294871 AnTuTu

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) by 54.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) (68/100 vs 46/100).

display

In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (80/100 vs 66/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) (86/100 vs 35/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition and the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) are nearly equal (56/100 vs 52/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) (52/100 vs 36/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) by 25 points (71/100 vs 46/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) has a MobileRank rating of 46/100, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition — 71/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on camera score (86/100 vs 35/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on performance (68/100 vs 46/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) over the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.