Motorola Moto E7 Plus vs Vivo Y32t
The Motorola Moto E7 Plus (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Moto E7 Plus leads — 29/100 vs 28/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 48 MP vs 13 MP; the Vivo Y32t is faster in AnTuTu (303,398 vs 251,428); the Vivo Y32t is noticeably lighter (179g vs 200g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Moto E7 Plus
Vivo Y32t
What makes Motorola Moto E7 Plus better?
- Better Geekbench Multi: 992 vs 779
- Better main camera: 48MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (29/100 vs 10/100)
What makes Vivo Y32t better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 303398 vs 251428
- Better Geekbench Single: 341 vs 272
- Lighter: 179g vs 200g
- Higher performance (20/100 vs 18/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 43/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 47/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Moto E7 Plus vs the Vivo Y32t, the Motorola Moto E7 Plus scores 1 points higher (29/100 vs 28/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Moto E7 Plus leads (29/100 vs 10/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y32t and the Motorola Moto E7 Plus are nearly equal (20/100 vs 18/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 39/100. In the "camera" category, the Motorola Moto E7 Plus notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (29/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Motorola Moto E7 Plus (68/100 vs 47/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Moto E7 Plus | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 251428 | 303398 | |
| Geekbench Single | 272 | 341 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 992 | 779 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | — | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | — | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | — | |
| Storage | 64GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 165.2×75.7×9.2 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 200 g | 179 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Motorola Moto E7 Plus
- Main: 48MP f/1.7
- Front: 8MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Motorola Moto E7 Plus
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Motorola Moto E7 Plus
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Moto E7 Plus and Vivo Y32t, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo Y32t leads Motorola Moto E7 Plus by 17.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y32t and the Motorola Moto E7 Plus are nearly equal (20/100 vs 18/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 39/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Moto E7 Plus notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (29/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Motorola Moto E7 Plus (68/100 vs 47/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Moto E7 Plus or the Vivo Y32t?
The Motorola Moto E7 Plus edges out the Vivo Y32t by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Moto E7 Plus and the Vivo Y32t?
The Motorola Moto E7 Plus has a MobileRank rating of 29/100, the Vivo Y32t — 28/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto E7 Plus or the Vivo Y32t?
The Motorola Moto E7 Plus leads on camera score (29/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Moto E7 Plus over the Vivo Y32t?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is portability — better on the Vivo Y32t (68/100 vs 47/100).