Motorola Moto E32 vs Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)
The Motorola Moto E32 (2022) runs on the Unisoc T606, while the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7200. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) leads — 30/100 vs 18/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 16 MP vs 50 MP.
Motorola Moto E32
Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)
- Lighter: 184g vs 188g
- Better design/ergonomics (70/100 vs 65/100)
- Faster charging: 44W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 16MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Better camera (27/100 vs 2/100)
- Longer battery life (42/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
Comparing the Motorola Moto E32 vs the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India), the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) scores 12 points higher (30/100 vs 18/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) leads (27/100 vs 2/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto E32 (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) notably outperforms the Motorola Moto E32 (27/100 vs 2/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) is a bit better (42/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto E32 is a bit better (70/100 vs 65/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Motorola Moto E32 | Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T606 | MediaTek Dimensity 7200 | |
| AnTuTu | 330006 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 378 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1335 | — | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 44W | |
| Main camera | 16 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1800 nits | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Protection | — | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 164.0×75.0×8.5 mm | 163.2×75.8×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 184 g | 188 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Motorola Moto E32
- Main: 16MP f/f/2.2
- Front: 8MP
Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Motorola Moto E32
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Moto E32
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto E32 (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) notably outperforms the Motorola Moto E32 (27/100 vs 2/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) is a bit better (42/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto E32 is a bit better (70/100 vs 65/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Motorola Moto E32 or the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)?
The Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) is noticeably better than the Motorola Moto E32 — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Moto E32 and the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)?
The Motorola Moto E32 has a MobileRank rating of 18/100, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) — 30/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto E32 or the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)?
The Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) leads on camera score (27/100 vs 2/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Moto E32 over the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)?
The Motorola Moto E32 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) is a better fit for everyday use.