Motorola Moto E32 vs Vivo Y53t 5G
The Motorola Moto E32 (2022) runs on the Unisoc T606, while the Vivo Y53t 5G (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 700 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y53t 5G leads — 35/100 vs 30/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 16 MP vs 13 MP; the Vivo Y53t 5G is faster in AnTuTu (515,647 vs 333,647).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Moto E32
Vivo Y53t 5G
What makes Motorola Moto E32 better?
- Better main camera: 16MP vs 13MP
- Lighter: 184g vs 186g
- Better camera (12/100 vs 10/100)
- Better display (44/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo Y53t 5G better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 515647 vs 333647
- Better Geekbench Single: 690 vs 378
- Better Geekbench Multi: 1736 vs 1335
- Higher performance (40/100 vs 27/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 43/100)
- Better portability (65/100 vs 64/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Moto E32 vs the Vivo Y53t 5G, the Vivo Y53t 5G scores 5 points higher (35/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y53t 5G leads (40/100 vs 27/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y53t 5G is a bit better (40/100 vs 27/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Moto E32 is a bit better (44/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Moto E32 and the Vivo Y53t 5G are nearly equal (12/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y53t 5G is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y53t 5G and the Motorola Moto E32 are nearly equal (65/100 vs 64/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Moto E32 | Vivo Y53t 5G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T606 | MediaTek Dimensity 700 () | |
| AnTuTu | 333647 | 515647 | |
| Geekbench Single | 378 | 690 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1335 | 1736 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | — | |
| Main camera | 16 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | — | |
| Storage | 64GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 13 | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 164.0×75.0×8.5 mm | 75.6×164.1×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 184 g | 186 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Motorola Moto E32
- Main: 16MP f/2.2
- Front: 8MP
Vivo Y53t 5G
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Display comparison
Motorola Moto E32
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo Y53t 5G
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Motorola Moto E32
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y53t 5G
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Moto E32 and Vivo Y53t 5G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo Y53t 5G leads Motorola Moto E32 by 35.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y53t 5G is a bit better (40/100 vs 27/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Moto E32 is a bit better (44/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Moto E32 and the Vivo Y53t 5G are nearly equal (12/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y53t 5G is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y53t 5G and the Motorola Moto E32 are nearly equal (65/100 vs 64/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Moto E32 or the Vivo Y53t 5G?
The Vivo Y53t 5G edges out the Motorola Moto E32 by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Moto E32 and the Vivo Y53t 5G?
The Motorola Moto E32 has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Vivo Y53t 5G — 35/100.
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Moto E32 or the Vivo Y53t 5G?
The Vivo Y53t 5G leads on performance (40/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Moto E32 over the Vivo Y53t 5G?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is performance — better on the Vivo Y53t 5G (40/100 vs 27/100).