Motorola Moto E32 vs Nokia 8 V 5G UW

The Motorola Moto E32 (2022) runs on the Unisoc T606, while the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW leads — 45/100 vs 30/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Moto E32 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 16 MP vs 64 MP; the Nokia 8 V 5G UW is faster in AnTuTu (597,974 vs 330,006); the Nokia 8 V 5G UW has NFC for contactless payments, the Motorola Moto E32 doesn't; the Motorola Moto E32 is noticeably lighter (184g vs 230g).

The Nokia 8 V 5G UW is noticeably better than the Motorola Moto E32 — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Moto E32
Performance 27
Display 44
Camera 12
Battery 43
Portability 64
Value for money
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
Performance 44
Display 63
Camera 47
Battery 33
Portability 30
Value for money
What makes Motorola Moto E32 better?
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
  • Lighter: 184g vs 230g

  • Longer battery life (43/100 vs 33/100)
  • Better portability (64/100 vs 30/100)
What makes Nokia 8 V 5G UW better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 597974 vs 330006
  • Better Geekbench Single: 799 vs 378
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 1836 vs 1335
  • Better main camera: 64MP vs 16MP

  • Higher performance (44/100 vs 27/100)
  • Better camera (47/100 vs 12/100)
  • Better display (63/100 vs 44/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Moto E32 vs the Nokia 8 V 5G UW, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW scores 15 points higher (45/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW leads (44/100 vs 27/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW leads (47/100 vs 12/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Moto E32 leads (43/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW notably outperforms the Motorola Moto E32 (44/100 vs 27/100). In the "display" category, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW notably outperforms the Motorola Moto E32 (63/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto E32 (47/100 vs 12/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Moto E32 is a bit better (43/100 vs 33/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto E32 significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (64/100 vs 30/100).

Motorola Moto E32: The Motorola Moto E32 is a better fit for everyday use.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW: The Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better fit for everyday use.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Moto E32 Nokia 8 V 5G UW
Processor Unisoc T606 Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
AnTuTu 330006 597974
Geekbench Single 378 799
Geekbench Multi 1335 1836
Display 6.5" IPS LCD 6.0" IPS LCD
Resolution 720x1600 1080x2400
Refresh rate 90 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 4500 mAh
Charging 18W 18W
Main camera 16 MP 64 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 12 MP
Front camera 8 MP 24 MP
RAM 4GB 6GB
Storage 64GB 64GB
OS Android 11 Android 10
NFC no yes
Dimensions 164.0×75.0×8.5 mm 171.9×78.6×9.0 mm
Weight 184 g 230 g
Launch price
Camera comparison
Motorola Moto E32
  • Main: 16MP f/f/2.2
  • Front: 8MP
12
camera
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
  • Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Front: 24MP
47
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Moto E32
  • 6.5" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
44
display
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
  • 6.0" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: —
63
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Moto E32
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
  • 4500 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
33
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Moto E32 and Nokia 8 V 5G UW, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Moto E32 Unisoc T606
30/100
330006 AnTuTu
Nokia 8 V 5G UW Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
45/100 +44.8%
597974 AnTuTu

Nokia 8 V 5G UW leads Motorola Moto E32 by 44.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW notably outperforms the Motorola Moto E32 (44/100 vs 27/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW notably outperforms the Motorola Moto E32 (63/100 vs 44/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto E32 (47/100 vs 12/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Moto E32 is a bit better (43/100 vs 33/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Moto E32 significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (64/100 vs 30/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Moto E32 or the Nokia 8 V 5G UW?

The Nokia 8 V 5G UW is noticeably better than the Motorola Moto E32 — the overall rating gap is 15 points.

What is the rating of the Motorola Moto E32 and the Nokia 8 V 5G UW?

The Motorola Moto E32 has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW — 45/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto E32 or the Nokia 8 V 5G UW?

The Nokia 8 V 5G UW leads on camera score (47/100 vs 12/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Moto E32 or the Nokia 8 V 5G UW?

The Nokia 8 V 5G UW leads on performance (44/100 vs 27/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Moto E32 over the Nokia 8 V 5G UW?

The Motorola Moto E32 is a better fit for everyday use. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better fit for everyday use.