Meizu Note 16 vs Redmi Turbo 5
The Meizu Note 16 (2025) runs on the Unisoc T8200, while the Redmi Turbo 5 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads — 67/100 vs 44/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Turbo 5 has the bigger battery (7560 mAh vs 6600); the Redmi Turbo 5 is thinner (8.2mm vs 9.2mm).
Meizu Note 16
Redmi Turbo 5
- Overall rating 44/100
- Better Geekbench Single: 1553 vs 750
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6403 vs 2200
- Bigger battery: 7560 vs 6600 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 40W
- Lighter: 204g vs 217g
- Higher performance (80/100 vs 40/100)
- Better camera (37/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (74/100 vs 57/100)
- Better display (85/100 vs 66/100)
- Better portability (55/100 vs 36/100)
Comparing the Meizu Note 16 vs the Redmi Turbo 5, the Redmi Turbo 5 scores 23 points higher (67/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads (80/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads (74/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Meizu Note 16 (80/100 vs 40/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 notably outperforms the Meizu Note 16 (85/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 is a bit better (37/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 notably outperforms the Meizu Note 16 (74/100 vs 57/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 notably outperforms the Meizu Note 16 (55/100 vs 36/100).
| Specification | Meizu Note 16 | Redmi Turbo 5 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T8200 | MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra | |
| AnTuTu | — | 2809170 | |
| Geekbench Single | 750 | 1553 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2200 | 6403 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.6" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2460 | 2756x1268 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6600 mAh | 7560 mAh | |
| Charging | 40W | 100W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 / Flyme AIOS 2 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1050 nits | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 167.6×75.8×9.2 mm | 157.5×75.2×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 217 g | 204 g | |
| Launch price | — | $250 |
Meizu Note 16
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Redmi Turbo 5
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Meizu Note 16
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2460
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi Turbo 5
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2756x1268
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Meizu Note 16
- 6600 mAh
- Wired: 40W
- No wireless charging
Redmi Turbo 5
- 7560 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Meizu Note 16
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Meizu Note 16 (80/100 vs 40/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 notably outperforms the Meizu Note 16 (85/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 is a bit better (37/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 notably outperforms the Meizu Note 16 (74/100 vs 57/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 notably outperforms the Meizu Note 16 (55/100 vs 36/100).
Which is better: the Meizu Note 16 or the Redmi Turbo 5?
The Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Meizu Note 16 by 23 points (67/100 vs 44/100).
What is the rating of the Meizu Note 16 and the Redmi Turbo 5?
The Meizu Note 16 has a MobileRank rating of 44/100, the Redmi Turbo 5 — 67/100.
Which has the better camera: the Meizu Note 16 or the Redmi Turbo 5?
The Redmi Turbo 5 leads on camera score (37/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Meizu Note 16 or the Redmi Turbo 5?
The Redmi Turbo 5 leads on performance (80/100 vs 40/100).
Should you choose the Meizu Note 16 over the Redmi Turbo 5?
The Meizu Note 16 is a better fit for everyday use. The Redmi Turbo 5 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.