Meizu Note 16 vs Redmi K80 Ultra
The Meizu Note 16 (2025) runs on the Unisoc T8200, while the Redmi K80 Ultra (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9400+. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi K80 Ultra leads — 73/100 vs 44/100 (a 29-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi K80 Ultra has the bigger battery (7410 mAh vs 6600).
Meizu Note 16
Redmi K80 Ultra
- Lighter: 217g vs 219g
- Overall rating 44/100
- Better Geekbench Single: 2729 vs 750
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8430 vs 2200
- Bigger battery: 7410 vs 6600 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 40W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (89/100 vs 40/100)
- Better camera (37/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (86/100 vs 57/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 66/100)
- Better portability (40/100 vs 36/100)
Comparing the Meizu Note 16 vs the Redmi K80 Ultra, the Redmi K80 Ultra scores 29 points higher (73/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra leads (89/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra significantly outperforms the Meizu Note 16 (89/100 vs 40/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra notably outperforms the Meizu Note 16 (94/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra is a bit better (37/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra notably outperforms the Meizu Note 16 (86/100 vs 57/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra and the Meizu Note 16 are nearly equal (40/100 vs 36/100).
| Specification | Meizu Note 16 | Redmi K80 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T8200 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | |
| AnTuTu | — | 2876004 | |
| Geekbench Single | 750 | 2729 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2200 | 8430 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2460 | 1280x2772 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 6600 mAh | 7410 mAh | |
| Charging | 40W | 100W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 / Flyme AIOS 2 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1050 nits | 3200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 167.6×75.8×9.2 mm | — | |
| Weight | 217 g | 219 g | |
| Launch price | — | $350 |
Meizu Note 16
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Redmi K80 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Meizu Note 16
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2460
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi K80 Ultra
- 6.8" OLED
- Resolution: 1280x2772
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Meizu Note 16
- 6600 mAh
- Wired: 40W
- No wireless charging
Redmi K80 Ultra
- 7410 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless charging: no data
Meizu Note 16
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra significantly outperforms the Meizu Note 16 (89/100 vs 40/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra notably outperforms the Meizu Note 16 (94/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra is a bit better (37/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra notably outperforms the Meizu Note 16 (86/100 vs 57/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra and the Meizu Note 16 are nearly equal (40/100 vs 36/100).
Which is better: the Meizu Note 16 or the Redmi K80 Ultra?
The Redmi K80 Ultra significantly outperforms the Meizu Note 16 by 29 points (73/100 vs 44/100).
What is the rating of the Meizu Note 16 and the Redmi K80 Ultra?
The Meizu Note 16 has a MobileRank rating of 44/100, the Redmi K80 Ultra — 73/100.
Which has the better camera: the Meizu Note 16 or the Redmi K80 Ultra?
The Redmi K80 Ultra leads on camera score (37/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Meizu Note 16 or the Redmi K80 Ultra?
The Redmi K80 Ultra leads on performance (89/100 vs 40/100).
Should you choose the Meizu Note 16 over the Redmi K80 Ultra?
The Meizu Note 16 is a better fit for everyday use. The Redmi K80 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.