Meizu Note 16 Pro vs Vivo X300s
The Meizu Note 16 Pro (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, while the Vivo X300s (2026) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300s leads — 89/100 vs 58/100 (a 31-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300s has the bigger battery (7100 mAh vs 6200); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300s is faster in AnTuTu (3,703,823 vs 1,041,899); the Meizu Note 16 Pro is noticeably lighter (198g vs 217g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Meizu Note 16 Pro
Vivo X300s
What makes Meizu Note 16 Pro better?
- Lighter: 198g vs 217g
- Better portability (55/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo X300s better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3703823 vs 1041899
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1161
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 3390
- Bigger battery: 7100 vs 6200 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 80W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (95/100 vs 60/100)
- Better camera (94/100 vs 33/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 64/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 93/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Meizu Note 16 Pro vs the Vivo X300s, the Vivo X300s scores 31 points higher (89/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s leads (95/100 vs 60/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s leads (94/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s leads (83/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Meizu Note 16 Pro (95/100 vs 60/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s and the Meizu Note 16 Pro are nearly equal (94/100 vs 93/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Meizu Note 16 Pro (94/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Meizu Note 16 Pro (83/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Meizu Note 16 Pro is a bit better (55/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Meizu Note 16 Pro | Vivo X300s | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 1041899 | 3703823 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1161 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3390 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.8" OLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2720 | 2800x1260 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 6200 mAh | 7100 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 / Flyme AIOS 2 | Android 16 / OriginOS 6 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Protection | IP66/IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 163.8×76.2×8.4 mm | — | |
| Weight | 198 g | 217 g | |
| Launch price | — | $723 |
Camera comparison
Meizu Note 16 Pro
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X300s
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Meizu Note 16 Pro
- 6.8" OLED
- Resolution: 1224x2720
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo X300s
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Meizu Note 16 Pro
- 6200 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300s
- 7100 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Meizu Note 16 Pro and Vivo X300s, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300s leads Meizu Note 16 Pro by 71.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Meizu Note 16 Pro
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Meizu Note 16 Pro (95/100 vs 60/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s and the Meizu Note 16 Pro are nearly equal (94/100 vs 93/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Meizu Note 16 Pro (94/100 vs 33/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Meizu Note 16 Pro (83/100 vs 64/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Meizu Note 16 Pro is a bit better (55/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Meizu Note 16 Pro or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Meizu Note 16 Pro by 31 points (89/100 vs 58/100).
What is the rating of the Meizu Note 16 Pro and the Vivo X300s?
The Meizu Note 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 58/100, the Vivo X300s — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Meizu Note 16 Pro or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s leads on camera score (94/100 vs 33/100).
Which is more powerful: the Meizu Note 16 Pro or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s leads on performance (95/100 vs 60/100).
Should you choose the Meizu Note 16 Pro over the Vivo X300s?
The Meizu Note 16 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.