Meizu Note 16 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R11
The Meizu Note 16 Pro (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, while the Sharp Aquos R11 (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4. By overall MobileRank rating, the Sharp Aquos R11 leads — 74/100 vs 58/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the Meizu Note 16 Pro has the bigger battery (6200 mAh vs 5100); the Sharp Aquos R11 is faster in AnTuTu (2,314,417 vs 1,041,899).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Meizu Note 16 Pro
Sharp Aquos R11
What makes Meizu Note 16 Pro better?
- Bigger battery: 6200 vs 5100 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 36W
- Longer battery life (64/100 vs 49/100)
- Better display (93/100 vs 90/100)
- Better portability (55/100 vs 52/100)
What makes Sharp Aquos R11 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2314417 vs 1041899
- Better Geekbench Single: 2072 vs 1161
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6649 vs 3390
- Higher refresh rate: 240Hz vs 144Hz
- Lighter: 195g vs 198g
- Higher performance (81/100 vs 60/100)
- Better camera (76/100 vs 33/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Meizu Note 16 Pro vs the Sharp Aquos R11, the Sharp Aquos R11 scores 16 points higher (74/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Sharp Aquos R11 leads (81/100 vs 60/100). In the "camera" category, the Sharp Aquos R11 leads (76/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Meizu Note 16 Pro leads (64/100 vs 49/100). In the "performance" category, the Sharp Aquos R11 notably outperforms the Meizu Note 16 Pro (81/100 vs 60/100). In the "display" category, the Meizu Note 16 Pro and the Sharp Aquos R11 are nearly equal (93/100 vs 90/100). In the "camera" category, the Sharp Aquos R11 significantly outperforms the Meizu Note 16 Pro (76/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Meizu Note 16 Pro notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R11 (64/100 vs 49/100). In the "portability" category, the Meizu Note 16 Pro and the Sharp Aquos R11 are nearly equal (55/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Meizu Note 16 Pro | Sharp Aquos R11 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 | Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | |
| AnTuTu | 1041899 | 2314417 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1161 | 2072 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3390 | 6649 | |
| Display | 6.8" OLED | 6.5" PRO IGZO LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2720 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 240 Hz | |
| Battery | 6200 mAh | 5100 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 36W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 38 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB / 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 / Flyme AIOS 2 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 3600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP66/IP68 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 163.8×76.2×8.4 mm | 156.0×74.0×8.9 mm | |
| Weight | 198 g | 195 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Meizu Note 16 Pro
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 8MP
Sharp Aquos R11
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 38MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Meizu Note 16 Pro
- 6.8" OLED
- Resolution: 1224x2720
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Sharp Aquos R11
- 6.5" PRO IGZO LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 240 Hz
Battery and charging
Meizu Note 16 Pro
- 6200 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Sharp Aquos R11
- 5100 mAh
- Wired: 36W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Meizu Note 16 Pro and Sharp Aquos R11, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Sharp Aquos R11 leads Meizu Note 16 Pro by 55.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Sharp Aquos R11 notably outperforms the Meizu Note 16 Pro (81/100 vs 60/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Meizu Note 16 Pro and the Sharp Aquos R11 are nearly equal (93/100 vs 90/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Sharp Aquos R11 significantly outperforms the Meizu Note 16 Pro (76/100 vs 33/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Meizu Note 16 Pro notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R11 (64/100 vs 49/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Meizu Note 16 Pro and the Sharp Aquos R11 are nearly equal (55/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Meizu Note 16 Pro or the Sharp Aquos R11?
The Sharp Aquos R11 is noticeably better than the Meizu Note 16 Pro — the overall rating gap is 16 points.
What is the rating of the Meizu Note 16 Pro and the Sharp Aquos R11?
The Meizu Note 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 58/100, the Sharp Aquos R11 — 74/100.
Which has the better camera: the Meizu Note 16 Pro or the Sharp Aquos R11?
The Sharp Aquos R11 leads on camera score (76/100 vs 33/100).
Which is more powerful: the Meizu Note 16 Pro or the Sharp Aquos R11?
The Sharp Aquos R11 leads on performance (81/100 vs 60/100).
Should you choose the Meizu Note 16 Pro over the Sharp Aquos R11?
The Meizu Note 16 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Sharp Aquos R11 is a better fit for gamers and power users.