Meizu 20 Classic vs Sharp Aquos R11
The Meizu 20 Classic (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, while the Sharp Aquos R11 (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4. By overall MobileRank rating, the Sharp Aquos R11 leads — 74/100 vs 64/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Sharp Aquos R11 has the bigger battery (5100 mAh vs 4700); the Sharp Aquos R11 is faster in AnTuTu (2,314,417 vs 1,757,044).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Meizu 20 Classic
Sharp Aquos R11
What makes Meizu 20 Classic better?
- Faster charging: 67W vs 36W
- Lighter: 190g vs 195g
- Better portability (65/100 vs 52/100)
What makes Sharp Aquos R11 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2314417 vs 1757044
- Better Geekbench Single: 2072 vs 2004
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6649 vs 5311
- Bigger battery: 5100 vs 4700 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 240Hz vs 144Hz
- Higher performance (81/100 vs 76/100)
- Better camera (76/100 vs 44/100)
- Longer battery life (49/100 vs 47/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Meizu 20 Classic vs the Sharp Aquos R11, the Sharp Aquos R11 scores 10 points higher (74/100 vs 64/100). In the "camera" category, the Sharp Aquos R11 leads (76/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Sharp Aquos R11 is a bit better (81/100 vs 76/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 90/100. In the "camera" category, the Sharp Aquos R11 significantly outperforms the Meizu 20 Classic (76/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Sharp Aquos R11 and the Meizu 20 Classic are nearly equal (49/100 vs 47/100). In the "portability" category, the Meizu 20 Classic is a bit better (65/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Meizu 20 Classic | Sharp Aquos R11 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | |
| AnTuTu | 1757044 | 2314417 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2004 | 2072 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5311 | 6649 | |
| Display | 6.5" OLED | 6.5" PRO IGZO LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 240 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 5100 mAh | |
| Charging | 67W | 36W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 16 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 38 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | 3600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 157.9×73.5×8.0 mm | 156.0×74.0×8.9 mm | |
| Weight | 190 g | 195 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Meizu 20 Classic
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 16MP
- Front: 32MP
Sharp Aquos R11
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 38MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Meizu 20 Classic
- 6.5" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Sharp Aquos R11
- 6.5" PRO IGZO LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 240 Hz
Battery and charging
Meizu 20 Classic
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 67W
- No wireless charging
Sharp Aquos R11
- 5100 mAh
- Wired: 36W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Meizu 20 Classic and Sharp Aquos R11, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Sharp Aquos R11 leads Meizu 20 Classic by 24.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Sharp Aquos R11 is a bit better (81/100 vs 76/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 90/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Sharp Aquos R11 significantly outperforms the Meizu 20 Classic (76/100 vs 44/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Sharp Aquos R11 and the Meizu 20 Classic are nearly equal (49/100 vs 47/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Meizu 20 Classic is a bit better (65/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Meizu 20 Classic or the Sharp Aquos R11?
The Sharp Aquos R11 is noticeably better than the Meizu 20 Classic — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
What is the rating of the Meizu 20 Classic and the Sharp Aquos R11?
The Meizu 20 Classic has a MobileRank rating of 64/100, the Sharp Aquos R11 — 74/100.
Which has the better camera: the Meizu 20 Classic or the Sharp Aquos R11?
The Sharp Aquos R11 leads on camera score (76/100 vs 44/100).
Which is more powerful: the Meizu 20 Classic or the Sharp Aquos R11?
The Sharp Aquos R11 leads on performance (81/100 vs 76/100).
Should you choose the Meizu 20 Classic over the Sharp Aquos R11?
The Meizu 20 Classic is a better fit for active users. The Sharp Aquos R11 is a better fit for gamers and power users.