Meizu Lucky 08 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
The Meizu Lucky 08 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads — 74/100 vs 56/100 (a 18-point difference). Key differences: the Meizu Lucky 08 has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 108 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 798,429); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide has NFC for contactless payments, the Meizu Lucky 08 doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is thinner (4.5mm vs 8.6mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Meizu Lucky 08
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
What makes Meizu Lucky 08 better?
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4800 mAh
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Longer battery life (56/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 80/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 798429
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1015
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2687
- Lighter: 201g vs 202g
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 53/100)
- Better camera (50/100 vs 39/100)
- Better portability (74/100 vs 51/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Meizu Lucky 08 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide scores 18 points higher (74/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (98/100 vs 53/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (50/100 vs 39/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Meizu Lucky 08 (98/100 vs 53/100). In the "display" category, the Meizu Lucky 08 is a bit better (94/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (50/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Meizu Lucky 08 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide are nearly equal (56/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Meizu Lucky 08 (74/100 vs 51/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Meizu Lucky 08 | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 798429 | 3950082 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1015 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2687 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1264x2780 | 1828x2448 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 4800 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 45W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 17 / One UI 9 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 3000 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 163.0×77.5×8.6 mm | 161.4×123.9×4.5 mm | |
| Weight | 202 g | 201 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Meizu Lucky 08
- Main: 108MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Meizu Lucky 08
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1264x2780
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 1828x2448
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Meizu Lucky 08
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: supported, wattage unknown
Overall performance score
We compared Meizu Lucky 08 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads Meizu Lucky 08 by 79.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Meizu Lucky 08 (98/100 vs 53/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Meizu Lucky 08 is a bit better (94/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (50/100 vs 39/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Meizu Lucky 08 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide are nearly equal (56/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Meizu Lucky 08 (74/100 vs 51/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Meizu Lucky 08 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is noticeably better than the Meizu Lucky 08 — the overall rating gap is 18 points.
What is the rating of the Meizu Lucky 08 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Meizu Lucky 08 has a MobileRank rating of 56/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide — 74/100.
Which has the better camera: the Meizu Lucky 08 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads on camera score (50/100 vs 39/100).
Which is more powerful: the Meizu Lucky 08 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads on performance (98/100 vs 53/100).
Should you choose the Meizu Lucky 08 over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users.