Lava Storm Play vs Vivo Y77 (China)
The Lava Storm Play (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the Vivo Y77 (China) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 930. Both devices score the same overall rating of 45/100. Key differences: the Lava Storm Play has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4500); the Lava Storm Play is faster in AnTuTu (693,978 vs 593,307).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Storm Play
Vivo Y77 (China)
What makes Lava Storm Play better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 693978 vs 593307
- Better Geekbench Single: 1037 vs 915
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2386 vs 2299
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
- Higher performance (51/100 vs 47/100)
- Better portability (59/100 vs 56/100)
What makes Vivo Y77 (China) better?
- Faster charging: 80W vs 18W
- Lighter: 194g vs 196g
- Longer battery life (45/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (66/100 vs 55/100)
Comparison verdict
The Lava Storm Play and the Vivo Y77 (China) received the same MobileRank rating — 45/100. In the "performance" category, the Lava Storm Play and the Vivo Y77 (China) are nearly equal (51/100 vs 47/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) is a bit better (66/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) and the Lava Storm Play are nearly equal (45/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Storm Play and the Vivo Y77 (China) are nearly equal (59/100 vs 56/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Storm Play | Vivo Y77 (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | MediaTek Dimensity 930 | |
| AnTuTu | 693978 | 593307 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1037 | 915 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2386 | 2299 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1080x2388 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12, Origin OS Ocean | |
| Brightness (peak) | 750 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Protection | IP64 | — | |
| Dimensions | 168.8×78.1×8.3 mm | 164.2×75.8×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 196 g | 194 g | |
| Launch price | $109 | — |
Camera comparison
Lava Storm Play
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo Y77 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Lava Storm Play
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y77 (China)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Storm Play
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y77 (China)
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Storm Play and Vivo Y77 (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Lava Storm Play leads Vivo Y77 (China) by 17.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo Y77 (China)
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Lava Storm Play and the Vivo Y77 (China) are nearly equal (51/100 vs 47/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) is a bit better (66/100 vs 55/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) and the Lava Storm Play are nearly equal (45/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Lava Storm Play and the Vivo Y77 (China) are nearly equal (59/100 vs 56/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Storm Play or the Vivo Y77 (China)?
Both devices scored 45/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Lava Storm Play (51/100 vs 47/100).
What is the rating of the Lava Storm Play and the Vivo Y77 (China)?
The Lava Storm Play has a MobileRank rating of 45/100, the Vivo Y77 (China) — 45/100.
Should you choose the Lava Storm Play over the Vivo Y77 (China)?
The Lava Storm Play is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.