Lava Blaze Duo 3 vs Vivo Y77 (China)
The Lava Blaze Duo 3 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the Vivo Y77 (China) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 930. By overall MobileRank rating, the Lava Blaze Duo 3 leads — 50/100 vs 45/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Lava Blaze Duo 3 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4500); the Lava Blaze Duo 3 is faster in AnTuTu (693,978 vs 593,307); the Lava Blaze Duo 3 is thinner (7.6mm vs 8.6mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Blaze Duo 3
Vivo Y77 (China)
What makes Lava Blaze Duo 3 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 693978 vs 593307
- Better Geekbench Single: 1037 vs 915
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2386 vs 2299
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
- Lighter: 181g vs 194g
- Higher performance (51/100 vs 47/100)
- Longer battery life (46/100 vs 45/100)
- Better display (79/100 vs 66/100)
- Better portability (74/100 vs 56/100)
What makes Vivo Y77 (China) better?
- Faster charging: 80W vs 33W
- Overall rating 45/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Blaze Duo 3 vs the Vivo Y77 (China), the Lava Blaze Duo 3 scores 5 points higher (50/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Duo 3 and the Vivo Y77 (China) are nearly equal (51/100 vs 47/100). In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Duo 3 is a bit better (79/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100. In the "battery" category, the Lava Blaze Duo 3 and the Vivo Y77 (China) are nearly equal (46/100 vs 45/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Duo 3 notably outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (74/100 vs 56/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Blaze Duo 3 | Vivo Y77 (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | MediaTek Dimensity 930 | |
| AnTuTu | 693978 | 593307 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1037 | 915 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2386 | 2299 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2388 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12, Origin OS Ocean | |
| NFC | — | no | |
| Protection | IP64 | — | |
| Dimensions | 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm | 164.2×75.8×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 181 g | 194 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Lava Blaze Duo 3
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo Y77 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Lava Blaze Duo 3
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y77 (China)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Blaze Duo 3
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y77 (China)
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Blaze Duo 3 and Vivo Y77 (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Lava Blaze Duo 3 leads Vivo Y77 (China) by 17.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Duo 3 and the Vivo Y77 (China) are nearly equal (51/100 vs 47/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Duo 3 is a bit better (79/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Lava Blaze Duo 3 and the Vivo Y77 (China) are nearly equal (46/100 vs 45/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Duo 3 notably outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (74/100 vs 56/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Blaze Duo 3 or the Vivo Y77 (China)?
The Lava Blaze Duo 3 edges out the Vivo Y77 (China) by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Duo 3 and the Vivo Y77 (China)?
The Lava Blaze Duo 3 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Vivo Y77 (China) — 45/100.
Should you choose the Lava Blaze Duo 3 over the Vivo Y77 (China)?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is portability — better on the Lava Blaze Duo 3 (74/100 vs 56/100).