Lava Bold N2 5G vs Tecno Spark 40 Pro
The Lava Bold N2 5G (2026) runs on the Unisoc T8200, while the Tecno Spark 40 Pro (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G100; launch prices were $105 and $150. By overall MobileRank rating, the Tecno Spark 40 Pro leads — 46/100 vs 36/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Lava Bold N2 5G has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 48 MP.
Lava Bold N2 5G
Tecno Spark 40 Pro
- Better Geekbench Single: 750 vs 727
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2200 vs 2014
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Cheaper at launch: $105 vs $150
- Longer battery life (60/100 vs 48/100)
- Faster charging: 45W vs 10W
- Better main camera: 48MP vs 13MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (44/100 vs 40/100)
- Better camera (29/100 vs 10/100)
- Better display (70/100 vs 43/100)
Comparing the Lava Bold N2 5G vs the Tecno Spark 40 Pro, the Tecno Spark 40 Pro scores 10 points higher (46/100 vs 36/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Spark 40 Pro leads (29/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Lava Bold N2 5G leads (60/100 vs 48/100). Value score: Lava Bold N2 5G — 56/100, Tecno Spark 40 Pro — 68/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Tecno Spark 40 Pro and the Lava Bold N2 5G are nearly equal (44/100 vs 40/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Spark 40 Pro notably outperforms the Lava Bold N2 5G (70/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Spark 40 Pro notably outperforms the Lava Bold N2 5G (29/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Lava Bold N2 5G is a bit better (60/100 vs 48/100).
| Specification | Lava Bold N2 5G | Tecno Spark 40 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T8200 | MediaTek Helio G100 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 576015 | |
| Geekbench Single | 750 | 727 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2200 | 2014 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.7" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1600x720 | 1224x2720 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 45W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 48 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15, HIOS 15.1 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | — | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.7×75.9×6.7 mm | |
| Weight | — | 195 g | |
| Launch price | $105 | $150 |
Lava Bold N2 5G
- Main: 13MP f/f/2.0
- Front: 5MP
Tecno Spark 40 Pro
- Main: 48MP
- Front: 8MP
Lava Bold N2 5G
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1600x720
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Tecno Spark 40 Pro
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1224x2720
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Lava Bold N2 5G
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- Wireless charging: no data
Tecno Spark 40 Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Launch price difference: $45. Lava Bold N2 5G was $45 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Tecno Spark 40 Pro and the Lava Bold N2 5G are nearly equal (44/100 vs 40/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Spark 40 Pro notably outperforms the Lava Bold N2 5G (70/100 vs 43/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Tecno Spark 40 Pro notably outperforms the Lava Bold N2 5G (29/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Lava Bold N2 5G is a bit better (60/100 vs 48/100).
Which is better: the Lava Bold N2 5G or the Tecno Spark 40 Pro?
The Tecno Spark 40 Pro is noticeably better than the Lava Bold N2 5G — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
What is the rating of the Lava Bold N2 5G and the Tecno Spark 40 Pro?
The Lava Bold N2 5G has a MobileRank rating of 36/100, the Tecno Spark 40 Pro — 46/100.
Which has the better camera: the Lava Bold N2 5G or the Tecno Spark 40 Pro?
The Tecno Spark 40 Pro leads on camera score (29/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Lava Bold N2 5G over the Tecno Spark 40 Pro?
The Lava Bold N2 5G is a better fit for everyday use. The Tecno Spark 40 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.