Lava Bold N2 5G vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
Comparing the Lava Bold N2 5G (2026) and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (2024) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads — 37/100 vs 20/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 13 MP vs 200 MP.
Lava Bold N2 5G
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Longer battery life (45/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 55/100)
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Better camera (81/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
Comparing the Lava Bold N2 5G vs the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim scores 17 points higher (37/100 vs 20/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads (81/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Lava Bold N2 5G leads (45/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Lava Bold N2 5G leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Lava Bold N2 5G (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Lava Bold N2 5G (81/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Lava Bold N2 5G significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (45/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, both devices are on the same level — 50/100. In the "value for money" category, the Lava Bold N2 5G significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (100/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Lava Bold N2 5G | Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T8200 | — | |
| AnTuTu | 450000 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 750 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2200 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.7" OLED | |
| Resolution | 1600x720 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | — | |
| Charging | 10W | — | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15, One UI 7 | |
| NFC | — | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Weight | — | — | |
| Price | $105 | — |
Lava Bold N2 5G
- Main: 13MP f/f/2.0
- Front: 5MP
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Lava Bold N2 5G
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1600x720
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Lava Bold N2 5G
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- —
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Lava Bold N2 5G (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Lava Bold N2 5G (81/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Lava Bold N2 5G significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (45/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, both devices are on the same level — 50/100.
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Lava Bold N2 5G significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (100/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Lava Bold N2 5G or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is noticeably better than the Lava Bold N2 5G — the overall rating gap is 17 points.
What is the rating of the Lava Bold N2 5G and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Lava Bold N2 5G has a MobileRank rating of 20/100, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim — 37/100.
Which has the better camera: the Lava Bold N2 5G or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads on camera score (81/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Lava Bold N2 5G over the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Lava Bold N2 5G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is a better fit for mobile photography enthusiasts.