Lava Bold N2 5G vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8

The Lava Bold N2 5G (2026) runs on the Unisoc T8200, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (2026) runs on the Exynos 2600; estimated prices are $105 and $1099. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 leads — 57/100 vs 20/100 (a 37-point difference). Key differences: the Lava Bold N2 5G has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4300); the main camera is 13 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 is faster in AnTuTu (3,161,830 vs 450,000).

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 significantly outperforms the Lava Bold N2 5G by 37 points (57/100 vs 20/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Bold N2 5G
Performance 0
Display 50
Camera 0
Battery 45
Design 50
Value for money 100
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8
Performance 77
Display 100
Camera 30
Battery 23
Design 75
Value for money 34
What makes Lava Bold N2 5G better?
  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4300 mAh
  • Cheaper: $105 vs $1099

  • Longer battery life (45/100 vs 23/100)
  • Better value for money (100/100 vs 34/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3161830 vs 450000
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3271 vs 750
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11051 vs 2200
  • Faster charging: 25W vs 10W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz

  • Higher performance (77/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better camera (30/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
  • Better design/ergonomics (75/100 vs 50/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Lava Bold N2 5G vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 scores 37 points higher (57/100 vs 20/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 leads (77/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 leads (30/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Lava Bold N2 5G leads (45/100 vs 23/100). In the "value for money" category, the Lava Bold N2 5G leads (100/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 significantly outperforms the Lava Bold N2 5G (77/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 significantly outperforms the Lava Bold N2 5G (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 significantly outperforms the Lava Bold N2 5G (30/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Lava Bold N2 5G notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (45/100 vs 23/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 notably outperforms the Lava Bold N2 5G (75/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, the Lava Bold N2 5G significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (100/100 vs 34/100).

Lava Bold N2 5G: The Lava Bold N2 5G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8: The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 is a better fit for active users.
Specs comparison
Specification Lava Bold N2 5G Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8
Processor Unisoc T8200 Exynos 2600
AnTuTu 450000 3161830
Geekbench Single 750 3271
Geekbench Multi 2200 11051
Display 6.8" IPS LCD 6.9" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
Resolution 1600x720 1080x2520
Refresh rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 4300 mAh
Charging 10W 25W
Wireless charging 0W 15W
Main camera 13 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 12 MP
Front camera 5 MP 10 MP
RAM 4GB 12GB
Storage 64GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 16 Android 16 / One UI 8.5
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits
NFC yes
Protection IP48
Weight 180 g
Price $105 $1099
Camera comparison
Lava Bold N2 5G
  • Main: 13MP f/f/2.0
  • Front: 5MP
0
camera
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Front: 10MP
30
camera
Display comparison
Lava Bold N2 5G
  • 6.8" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1600x720
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
50
display
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8
  • 6.9" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 1080x2520
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Lava Bold N2 5G
  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 10W
  • No wireless charging
45
battery
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8
  • 4300 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
23
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Lava Bold N2 5G and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Lava Bold N2 5G Unisoc T8200
20/100
450000 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 Exynos 2600
57/100 +85.8%
3161830 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 leads Lava Bold N2 5G by 85.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Lava Bold N2 5G
$105
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8
$1099

Price difference: $994. Lava Bold N2 5G is cheaper by $994.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 significantly outperforms the Lava Bold N2 5G (77/100 vs 0/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 significantly outperforms the Lava Bold N2 5G (100/100 vs 50/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 significantly outperforms the Lava Bold N2 5G (30/100 vs 0/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Lava Bold N2 5G notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (45/100 vs 23/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 notably outperforms the Lava Bold N2 5G (75/100 vs 50/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Lava Bold N2 5G significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (100/100 vs 34/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Bold N2 5G or the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 significantly outperforms the Lava Bold N2 5G by 37 points (57/100 vs 20/100).

What is the rating of the Lava Bold N2 5G and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8?

The Lava Bold N2 5G has a MobileRank rating of 20/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 — 57/100.

Which has the better camera: the Lava Bold N2 5G or the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 leads on camera score (30/100 vs 0/100).

Which is more powerful: the Lava Bold N2 5G or the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 leads on performance (77/100 vs 0/100).

Should you choose the Lava Bold N2 5G over the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8?

The Lava Bold N2 5G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 is a better fit for active users.