Lava Blaze Dragon vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Lava Blaze Dragon (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $109 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 42/100 (a 49-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 568,395); the Vivo X300 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Dragon doesn't; the Lava Blaze Dragon is noticeably lighter (210g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon by 49 points (91/100 vs 42/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Lava Blaze Dragon

Performance 46
Display 56
Camera 30
Battery 43
Portability 41
Value for money 70

Vivo X300 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94

What makes Lava Blaze Dragon better?

  • Lighter: 210g vs 230g
  • Cheaper at launch: $109 vs $950

  • Better portability (41/100 vs 39/100)

What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 568395
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 915
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2115
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 18W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 46/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 30/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 56/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Lava Blaze Dragon vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 49 points higher (91/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 46/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 43/100). Value score: Lava Blaze Dragon — 70/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon (99/100 vs 46/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon (89/100 vs 56/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon (85/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Dragon and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (41/100 vs 39/100).

Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Lava Blaze Dragon Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 568395 4247433
Geekbench Single 915 3639
Geekbench Multi 2115 11047
Display 6.8" LCD 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 900x1600 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 18W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) — 170
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 8 MP 32 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 450 nits —
NFC no yes
Protection IP64 IP69
Dimensions 168.2×77.8×9.1 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 210 g 230 g
Launch price $109 $950

Camera comparison

Lava Blaze Dragon

  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

Display comparison

Lava Blaze Dragon

  • 6.8" LCD
  • Resolution: 900x1600
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
56
display

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

Battery and charging

Lava Blaze Dragon

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Lava Blaze Dragon and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Lava Blaze Dragon Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
42/100
568395 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +86.6%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Lava Blaze Dragon by 86.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Lava Blaze Dragon

$109

Vivo X300 Ultra

$950

Launch price difference: $841. Lava Blaze Dragon was $841 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon (99/100 vs 46/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon (89/100 vs 56/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon (96/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon (85/100 vs 43/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Dragon and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (41/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Lava Blaze Dragon or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon by 49 points (91/100 vs 42/100).

What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Dragon and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Lava Blaze Dragon has a MobileRank rating of 42/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Dragon or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 30/100).

Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Dragon or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 46/100).

Should you choose the Lava Blaze Dragon over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.