Lava Blaze Dragon vs TCL 50 NxtPaper

The Lava Blaze Dragon (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, while the TCL 50 NxtPaper (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300. By overall MobileRank rating, the TCL 50 NxtPaper leads — 47/100 vs 42/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the TCL 50 NxtPaper has the bigger battery (5010 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 108 MP; the Lava Blaze Dragon is faster in AnTuTu (568,395 vs 528,398); the TCL 50 NxtPaper has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Dragon doesn't; the TCL 50 NxtPaper is thinner (8.0mm vs 9.1mm).

The TCL 50 NxtPaper edges out the Lava Blaze Dragon by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Lava Blaze Dragon

Performance 46
Display 56
Camera 30
Battery 43
Portability 41
Value for money 70

TCL 50 NxtPaper

Performance 43
Display 66
Camera 42
Battery 46
Portability 62
Value for money —

What makes Lava Blaze Dragon better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 568395 vs 528398
  • Better Geekbench Single: 915 vs 771
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 2115 vs 1980

  • Higher performance (46/100 vs 43/100)

What makes TCL 50 NxtPaper better?

  • Bigger battery: 5010 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 33W vs 18W
  • Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 196g vs 210g

  • Better camera (42/100 vs 30/100)
  • Longer battery life (46/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better display (66/100 vs 56/100)
  • Better portability (62/100 vs 41/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Lava Blaze Dragon vs the TCL 50 NxtPaper, the TCL 50 NxtPaper scores 5 points higher (47/100 vs 42/100). In the "camera" category, the TCL 50 NxtPaper leads (42/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Dragon and the TCL 50 NxtPaper are nearly equal (46/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the TCL 50 NxtPaper is a bit better (66/100 vs 56/100). In the "camera" category, the TCL 50 NxtPaper is a bit better (42/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the TCL 50 NxtPaper and the Lava Blaze Dragon are nearly equal (46/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the TCL 50 NxtPaper notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon (62/100 vs 41/100).

Specs comparison

Specification Lava Blaze Dragon TCL 50 NxtPaper
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 MediaTek Dimensity 6300
AnTuTu 568395 528398
Geekbench Single 915 771
Geekbench Multi 2115 1980
Display 6.8" LCD 6.8" IPS LCD
Resolution 900x1600 1080x2460
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5010 mAh
Charging 18W 33W
Main camera 50 MP 108 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 8 MP
Front camera 8 MP 8 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB 8GB
Storage 128GB 256GB
OS Android 15 Android 14
Brightness (peak) 450 nits —
NFC no yes
Protection IP64 —
Dimensions 168.2×77.8×9.1 mm 167.6×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 210 g 196 g
Launch price $109 —

Camera comparison

Lava Blaze Dragon

  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera

TCL 50 NxtPaper

  • Main: 108MP
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 8MP
42
camera

Display comparison

Lava Blaze Dragon

  • 6.8" LCD
  • Resolution: 900x1600
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
56
display

TCL 50 NxtPaper

  • 6.8" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2460
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
66
display

Battery and charging

Lava Blaze Dragon

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery

TCL 50 NxtPaper

  • 5010 mAh
  • Wired: 33W
  • No wireless charging
46
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Lava Blaze Dragon and TCL 50 NxtPaper, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Lava Blaze Dragon Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
42/100
568395 AnTuTu
TCL 50 NxtPaper MediaTek Dimensity 6300
47/100 -7.6%
528398 AnTuTu

Lava Blaze Dragon leads TCL 50 NxtPaper by 7.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Lava Blaze Dragon

$109

TCL 50 NxtPaper

Price unknown

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Dragon and the TCL 50 NxtPaper are nearly equal (46/100 vs 43/100).

display

In the "display" category, the TCL 50 NxtPaper is a bit better (66/100 vs 56/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the TCL 50 NxtPaper is a bit better (42/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the TCL 50 NxtPaper and the Lava Blaze Dragon are nearly equal (46/100 vs 43/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the TCL 50 NxtPaper notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon (62/100 vs 41/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Lava Blaze Dragon or the TCL 50 NxtPaper?

The TCL 50 NxtPaper edges out the Lava Blaze Dragon by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Dragon and the TCL 50 NxtPaper?

The Lava Blaze Dragon has a MobileRank rating of 42/100, the TCL 50 NxtPaper — 47/100.

Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Dragon or the TCL 50 NxtPaper?

The TCL 50 NxtPaper leads on camera score (42/100 vs 30/100).

Should you choose the Lava Blaze Dragon over the TCL 50 NxtPaper?

Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is portability — better on the TCL 50 NxtPaper (62/100 vs 41/100).