Lava Blaze Dragon vs Poco M6
The Lava Blaze Dragon (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, while the Poco M6 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6100+; launch prices were $109 and $120. By overall MobileRank rating, the Lava Blaze Dragon leads — 42/100 vs 40/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Lava Blaze Dragon is faster in AnTuTu (568,395 vs 513,809); the Poco M6 is noticeably lighter (195g vs 210g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Blaze Dragon
Poco M6
What makes Lava Blaze Dragon better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 568395 vs 513809
- Better Geekbench Single: 915 vs 732
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2115 vs 1954
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Cheaper at launch: $109 vs $120
- Higher performance (46/100 vs 42/100)
- Better display (56/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Poco M6 better?
- Lighter: 195g vs 210g
- Better portability (60/100 vs 41/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Blaze Dragon vs the Poco M6, the Lava Blaze Dragon scores 2 points higher (42/100 vs 40/100). Value score: Lava Blaze Dragon — 70/100, Poco M6 — 62/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Dragon and the Poco M6 are nearly equal (46/100 vs 42/100). In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Dragon is a bit better (56/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100. In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100. In the "portability" category, the Poco M6 notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon (60/100 vs 41/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Blaze Dragon | Poco M6 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 | MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ | |
| AnTuTu | 568395 | 513809 | |
| Geekbench Single | 915 | 732 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2115 | 1954 | |
| Display | 6.8" LCD | 6.7" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 900x1600 | 1600x720 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 18W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 4GB / 6GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 13 / MIUI 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 450 nits | 600 nits | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Protection | IP64 | — | |
| Dimensions | 168.2×77.8×9.1 mm | 168.0×78.0×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 210 g | 195 g | |
| Launch price | $109 | $120 |
Camera comparison
Lava Blaze Dragon
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Poco M6
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 5MP
Display comparison
Lava Blaze Dragon
- 6.8" LCD
- Resolution: 900x1600
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco M6
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1600x720
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Blaze Dragon
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Poco M6
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Blaze Dragon and Poco M6, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Lava Blaze Dragon leads Poco M6 by 10.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $11. Lava Blaze Dragon was $11 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Dragon and the Poco M6 are nearly equal (46/100 vs 42/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Dragon is a bit better (56/100 vs 43/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100.
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco M6 notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon (60/100 vs 41/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Blaze Dragon or the Poco M6?
The Lava Blaze Dragon edges out the Poco M6 by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Dragon and the Poco M6?
The Lava Blaze Dragon has a MobileRank rating of 42/100, the Poco M6 — 40/100.
Should you choose the Lava Blaze Dragon over the Poco M6?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is portability — better on the Poco M6 (60/100 vs 41/100).