Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs TCL K70 SE
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the TCL K70 SE (2026) runs on the MediaTek Helio G50; launch prices were $139 and $55. By overall MobileRank rating, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads — 50/100 vs 18/100 (a 32-point difference). Key differences: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 5 MP; the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is faster in AnTuTu (693,978 vs 184,328); the TCL K70 SE is noticeably lighter (150g vs 174g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
TCL K70 SE
What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 693978 vs 184328
- Better Geekbench Single: 1037 vs 200
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2386 vs 889
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 3000 mAh
- Faster charging: 33W vs 10W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 5MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (51/100 vs 12/100)
- Better camera (30/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (46/100 vs 12/100)
- Better display (79/100 vs 43/100)
- Better portability (79/100 vs 68/100)
What makes TCL K70 SE better?
- Lighter: 150g vs 174g
- Cheaper at launch: $55 vs $139
- Overall rating 18/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs the TCL K70 SE, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 scores 32 points higher (50/100 vs 18/100). In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads (51/100 vs 12/100). In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads (30/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads (46/100 vs 12/100). Value score: Lava Blaze Amoled 2 — 78/100, TCL K70 SE — 32/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the TCL K70 SE (51/100 vs 12/100). In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the TCL K70 SE (79/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the TCL K70 SE (30/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the TCL K70 SE (46/100 vs 12/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (79/100 vs 68/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Blaze Amoled 2 | TCL K70 SE | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | MediaTek Helio G50 | |
| AnTuTu | 693978 | 184328 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1037 | 200 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2386 | 889 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 540x1210 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 3000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 10W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 5 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 2 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 64GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | 400 nits | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm | 165.9×76.6×9.4 mm | |
| Weight | 174 g | 150 g | |
| Launch price | $139 | $55 |
Camera comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
TCL K70 SE
- Main: 5MP f/2.2
- Front: 2MP
Display comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
TCL K70 SE
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 540x1210
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
TCL K70 SE
- 3000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and TCL K70 SE, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads TCL K70 SE by 276.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $84. TCL K70 SE was $84 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the TCL K70 SE (51/100 vs 12/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the TCL K70 SE (79/100 vs 43/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the TCL K70 SE (30/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the TCL K70 SE (46/100 vs 12/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (79/100 vs 68/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the TCL K70 SE?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the TCL K70 SE by 32 points (50/100 vs 18/100).
What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the TCL K70 SE?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the TCL K70 SE — 18/100.
Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the TCL K70 SE?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads on camera score (30/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the TCL K70 SE?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads on performance (51/100 vs 12/100).
Should you choose the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 over the TCL K70 SE?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.