Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs TCL 503

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the TCL 503 (2024) runs on the Unisoc SC9863A; launch prices were $139 and $115. By overall MobileRank rating, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads — 50/100 vs 20/100 (a 30-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 8 MP; the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is faster in AnTuTu (693,978 vs 153,667); the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is thinner (7.6mm vs 8.9mm).

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the TCL 503 by 30 points (50/100 vs 20/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

Performance 51
Display 79
Camera 30
Battery 46
Portability 79
Value for money 78

TCL 503

Performance 9
Display 32
Camera 10
Battery 43
Portability 58
Value for money 24

What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 693978 vs 153667
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1037 vs 205
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 2386 vs 846
  • Faster charging: 33W vs 10W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 8MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
  • Lighter: 174g vs 185g

  • Higher performance (51/100 vs 9/100)
  • Better camera (30/100 vs 10/100)
  • Longer battery life (46/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better display (79/100 vs 32/100)
  • Better portability (79/100 vs 58/100)

What makes TCL 503 better?

  • Cheaper at launch: $115 vs $139

  • Overall rating 20/100

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs the TCL 503, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 scores 30 points higher (50/100 vs 20/100). In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads (51/100 vs 9/100). In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads (30/100 vs 10/100). Value score: Lava Blaze Amoled 2 — 78/100, TCL 503 — 24/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the TCL 503 (51/100 vs 9/100). In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the TCL 503 (79/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the TCL 503 (30/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the TCL 503 are nearly equal (46/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the TCL 503 (79/100 vs 58/100).

Lava Blaze Amoled 2: The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Lava Blaze Amoled 2 TCL 503
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 7060 Unisoc SC9863A
AnTuTu 693978 153667
Geekbench Single 1037 205
Geekbench Multi 2386 846
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.6" IPS LCD
Resolution 1080x2400 720x1612
Refresh rate 120 Hz 60 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 33W 10W
Main camera 50 MP 8 MP
Front camera 8 MP 5 MP
RAM 6GB 3GB
Storage 128GB 64GB
OS Android 15 Android 14
Brightness (peak) 800 nits 350 nits
NFC no no
Protection IP64 —
Dimensions 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm 163.9×75.5×8.9 mm
Weight 174 g 185 g
Launch price $139 $115

Camera comparison

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera

TCL 503

  • Main: 8MP f/2.0
  • Front: 5MP
10
camera

Display comparison

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

TCL 503

  • 6.6" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1612
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
32
display

Battery and charging

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 33W
  • No wireless charging
46
battery

TCL 503

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 10W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and TCL 503, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Lava Blaze Amoled 2 MediaTek Dimensity 7060
50/100
693978 AnTuTu
TCL 503 Unisoc SC9863A
20/100 -351.6%
153667 AnTuTu

Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads TCL 503 by 351.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

$139

TCL 503

$115

Launch price difference: $24. TCL 503 was $24 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the TCL 503 (51/100 vs 9/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the TCL 503 (79/100 vs 32/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the TCL 503 (30/100 vs 10/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the TCL 503 are nearly equal (46/100 vs 43/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the TCL 503 (79/100 vs 58/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the TCL 503?

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the TCL 503 by 30 points (50/100 vs 20/100).

What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the TCL 503?

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the TCL 503 — 20/100.

Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the TCL 503?

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads on camera score (30/100 vs 10/100).

Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the TCL 503?

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads on performance (51/100 vs 9/100).

Should you choose the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 over the TCL 503?

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.