Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs Samsung Galaxy M13

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the Samsung Galaxy M13 (2022) runs on the Samsung Exynos 850; launch prices were $139 and $149. By overall MobileRank rating, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads — 50/100 vs 31/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is faster in AnTuTu (693,978 vs 234,339); the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably lighter (174g vs 192g).

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy M13 — the overall rating gap is 19 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

Performance 51
Display 79
Camera 30
Battery 46
Portability 79
Value for money 78

Samsung Galaxy M13

Performance 16
Display 42
Camera 30
Battery 51
Portability 68
Value for money 36

What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 693978 vs 234339
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1037 vs 300
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 2386 vs 836
  • Faster charging: 33W vs 15W
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
  • Lighter: 174g vs 192g
  • Cheaper at launch: $139 vs $149

  • Higher performance (51/100 vs 16/100)
  • Better display (79/100 vs 42/100)
  • Better portability (79/100 vs 68/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy M13 better?


  • Longer battery life (51/100 vs 46/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs the Samsung Galaxy M13, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 scores 19 points higher (50/100 vs 31/100). In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads (51/100 vs 16/100). Value score: Lava Blaze Amoled 2 — 78/100, Samsung Galaxy M13 — 36/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (51/100 vs 16/100). In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (79/100 vs 42/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100. In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy M13 is a bit better (51/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (79/100 vs 68/100).

Lava Blaze Amoled 2: The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Lava Blaze Amoled 2 Samsung Galaxy M13
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 7060 Samsung Exynos 850
AnTuTu 693978 234339
Geekbench Single 1037 300
Geekbench Multi 2386 836
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.6" IPS LCD
Resolution 1080x2400 2408x1080
Refresh rate 120 Hz 60 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 33W 15W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Front camera 8 MP 8 MP
RAM 6GB 4GB
Storage 128GB 64GB / 128GB
OS Android 15 Android 12
Brightness (peak) 800 nits —
NFC no —
Protection IP64 —
Dimensions 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm —
Weight 174 g 192 g
Launch price $139 $149

Camera comparison

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera

Samsung Galaxy M13

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera

Display comparison

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

Samsung Galaxy M13

  • 6.6" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 2408x1080
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
42
display

Battery and charging

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 33W
  • No wireless charging
46
battery

Samsung Galaxy M13

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 15W
  • Wireless charging: no data
51
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and Samsung Galaxy M13, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Lava Blaze Amoled 2 MediaTek Dimensity 7060
50/100
693978 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy M13 Samsung Exynos 850
31/100 -196.1%
234339 AnTuTu

Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads Samsung Galaxy M13 by 196.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

$139

Samsung Galaxy M13

$149

Launch price difference: $10. Lava Blaze Amoled 2 was $10 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (51/100 vs 16/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (79/100 vs 42/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100.

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy M13 is a bit better (51/100 vs 46/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (79/100 vs 68/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Samsung Galaxy M13?

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy M13 — the overall rating gap is 19 points.

What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the Samsung Galaxy M13?

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Samsung Galaxy M13 — 31/100.

Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Samsung Galaxy M13?

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads on performance (51/100 vs 16/100).

Should you choose the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 over the Samsung Galaxy M13?

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.