Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs Samsung Galaxy A03s

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the Samsung Galaxy A03s (2021) runs on the MediaTek Helio P35; launch prices were $139 and $130. By overall MobileRank rating, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads — 50/100 vs 25/100 (a 25-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is faster in AnTuTu (693,978 vs 199,111); the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably lighter (174g vs 196g).

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s by 25 points (50/100 vs 25/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

Performance 51
Display 79
Camera 30
Battery 46
Portability 79
Value for money 78

Samsung Galaxy A03s

Performance 19
Display 32
Camera 10
Battery 52
Portability 50
Value for money 30

What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 693978 vs 199111
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1037 vs 476
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 2386 vs 828
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
  • Lighter: 174g vs 196g

  • Higher performance (51/100 vs 19/100)
  • Better camera (30/100 vs 10/100)
  • Better display (79/100 vs 32/100)
  • Better portability (79/100 vs 50/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy A03s better?

  • Cheaper at launch: $130 vs $139

  • Longer battery life (52/100 vs 46/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs the Samsung Galaxy A03s, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 scores 25 points higher (50/100 vs 25/100). In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads (51/100 vs 19/100). In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads (30/100 vs 10/100). Value score: Lava Blaze Amoled 2 — 78/100, Samsung Galaxy A03s — 30/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s (51/100 vs 19/100). In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s (79/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s (30/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03s is a bit better (52/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s (79/100 vs 50/100).

Lava Blaze Amoled 2: The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Lava Blaze Amoled 2 Samsung Galaxy A03s
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 7060 MediaTek Helio P35
AnTuTu 693978 199111
Geekbench Single 1037 476
Geekbench Multi 2386 828
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.5" IPS LCD
Resolution 1080x2400 —
Refresh rate 120 Hz 60 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 33W —
Main camera 50 MP 13 MP
Front camera 8 MP 5 MP
RAM 6GB 2GB / 3GB / 4GB
Storage 128GB 32GB
OS Android 15 —
Brightness (peak) 800 nits —
NFC no no
Protection IP64 —
Dimensions 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm 164.2×75.9×9.1 mm
Weight 174 g 196 g
Launch price $139 $130

Camera comparison

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera

Samsung Galaxy A03s

  • Main: 13MP
  • Front: 5MP
10
camera

Display comparison

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

Samsung Galaxy A03s

  • 6.5" IPS LCD
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
32
display

Battery and charging

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 33W
  • No wireless charging
46
battery

Samsung Galaxy A03s

  • 5000 mAh
  • No wireless charging
52
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and Samsung Galaxy A03s, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Lava Blaze Amoled 2 MediaTek Dimensity 7060
50/100
693978 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy A03s MediaTek Helio P35
25/100 -248.5%
199111 AnTuTu

Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads Samsung Galaxy A03s by 248.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

$139

Samsung Galaxy A03s

$130

Launch price difference: $9. Samsung Galaxy A03s was $9 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s (51/100 vs 19/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s (79/100 vs 32/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s (30/100 vs 10/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03s is a bit better (52/100 vs 46/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s (79/100 vs 50/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Samsung Galaxy A03s?

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s by 25 points (50/100 vs 25/100).

What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the Samsung Galaxy A03s?

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Samsung Galaxy A03s — 25/100.

Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Samsung Galaxy A03s?

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads on camera score (30/100 vs 10/100).

Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Samsung Galaxy A03s?

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads on performance (51/100 vs 19/100).

Should you choose the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 over the Samsung Galaxy A03s?

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.