Itel A300+ vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra
The Itel A300+ (2026) runs on the Helio G81, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 33/100 (a 56-point difference). Key differences: the Itel A300+ has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 50 MP; the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,667,711 vs 358,608); the Xiaomi 17 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Itel A300+ doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Itel A300+
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
What makes Itel A300+ better?
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6000 mAh
- Overall rating 33/100
What makes Xiaomi 17 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3667711 vs 358608
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 432
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 1416
- Faster charging: 90W vs 22W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Higher performance (97/100 vs 30/100)
- Better camera (93/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 55/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 55/100)
- Better portability (40/100 vs 38/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Itel A300+ vs the Xiaomi 17 Ultra, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra scores 56 points higher (89/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (97/100 vs 30/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (80/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Itel A300+ (97/100 vs 30/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Itel A300+ (89/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Itel A300+ (93/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra notably outperforms the Itel A300+ (80/100 vs 55/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra and the Itel A300+ are nearly equal (40/100 vs 38/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Itel A300+ | Xiaomi 17 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Helio G81 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 358608 | 3667711 | |
| Geekbench Single | 432 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1416 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1576 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 22W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 166 | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB / 6GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 Go | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 168.2×79.6×8.8 mm | 162.9×77.6×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | — | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $999 |
Camera comparison
Itel A300+
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.63
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Itel A300+
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1576
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Itel A300+
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 22W
- No wireless charging
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 16:09 hrs, total 33:23 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Itel A300+ and Xiaomi 17 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads Itel A300+ by 90.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Itel A300+
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Itel A300+ (97/100 vs 30/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Itel A300+ (89/100 vs 55/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Itel A300+ (93/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra notably outperforms the Itel A300+ (80/100 vs 55/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra and the Itel A300+ are nearly equal (40/100 vs 38/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Itel A300+ or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Itel A300+ by 56 points (89/100 vs 33/100).
What is the rating of the Itel A300+ and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Itel A300+ has a MobileRank rating of 33/100, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Itel A300+ or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Itel A300+ or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads on performance (97/100 vs 30/100).
Should you choose the Itel A300+ over the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.