Infinix Hot 50 4G vs Lava Blaze Amoled 2
The Infinix Hot 50 4G (2024) runs on the MediaTek Helio G100, while the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060; launch prices were $150 and $139. By overall MobileRank rating, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads — 50/100 vs 44/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is faster in AnTuTu (693,978 vs 575,630).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Infinix Hot 50 4G
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
What makes Infinix Hot 50 4G better?
- Overall rating 44/100
What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 693978 vs 575630
- Better Geekbench Single: 1037 vs 727
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2386 vs 2014
- Faster charging: 33W vs 18W
- Lighter: 174g vs 187g
- Cheaper at launch: $139 vs $150
- Higher performance (51/100 vs 44/100)
- Longer battery life (46/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (79/100 vs 66/100)
- Better portability (79/100 vs 70/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Infinix Hot 50 4G vs the Lava Blaze Amoled 2, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 scores 6 points higher (50/100 vs 44/100). Value score: Infinix Hot 50 4G — 62/100, Lava Blaze Amoled 2 — 78/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (51/100 vs 44/100). In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (79/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100. In the "battery" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the Infinix Hot 50 4G are nearly equal (46/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (79/100 vs 70/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Infinix Hot 50 4G | Lava Blaze Amoled 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G100 | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | |
| AnTuTu | 575630 | 693978 | |
| Geekbench Single | 727 | 1037 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2014 | 2386 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2460 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 33W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 6GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | 800 nits | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Protection | — | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 167.9×75.6×7.7 mm | 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm | |
| Weight | 187 g | 174 g | |
| Launch price | $150 | $139 |
Camera comparison
Infinix Hot 50 4G
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Front: 8MP
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Infinix Hot 50 4G
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2460
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Infinix Hot 50 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Infinix Hot 50 4G and Lava Blaze Amoled 2, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads Infinix Hot 50 4G by 17.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $11. Lava Blaze Amoled 2 was $11 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (51/100 vs 44/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (79/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the Infinix Hot 50 4G are nearly equal (46/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (79/100 vs 70/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Infinix Hot 50 4G or the Lava Blaze Amoled 2?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 edges out the Infinix Hot 50 4G by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Infinix Hot 50 4G and the Lava Blaze Amoled 2?
The Infinix Hot 50 4G has a MobileRank rating of 44/100, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 — 50/100.
Which is more powerful: the Infinix Hot 50 4G or the Lava Blaze Amoled 2?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads on performance (51/100 vs 44/100).
Should you choose the Infinix Hot 50 4G over the Lava Blaze Amoled 2?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.