Infinix GT 50 Pro vs Lava Blaze Amoled 2
The Infinix GT 50 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultimate, while the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060; launch prices were $349 and $139. By overall MobileRank rating, the Infinix GT 50 Pro leads — 65/100 vs 50/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Infinix GT 50 Pro has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5000); the Infinix GT 50 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (1,959,760 vs 693,978); the Infinix GT 50 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 doesn't; the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably lighter (174g vs 200g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Infinix GT 50 Pro
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
What makes Infinix GT 50 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 1959760 vs 693978
- Better Geekbench Single: 1579 vs 1037
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6100 vs 2386
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 33W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (76/100 vs 51/100)
- Better camera (34/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (69/100 vs 46/100)
- Better display (92/100 vs 79/100)
What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?
- Lighter: 174g vs 200g
- Cheaper at launch: $139 vs $349
- Better portability (79/100 vs 60/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Infinix GT 50 Pro vs the Lava Blaze Amoled 2, the Infinix GT 50 Pro scores 15 points higher (65/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro leads (76/100 vs 51/100). In the "battery" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro leads (69/100 vs 46/100). Value score: Infinix GT 50 Pro — 64/100, Lava Blaze Amoled 2 — 78/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (76/100 vs 51/100). In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro is a bit better (92/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro and the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 are nearly equal (34/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (69/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro (79/100 vs 60/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Infinix GT 50 Pro | Lava Blaze Amoled 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultimate | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | |
| AnTuTu | 1959760 | 693978 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1579 | 1037 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6100 | 2386 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1208x2644 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 33W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 6GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 800 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm | |
| Weight | 200 g | 174 g | |
| Launch price | $349 | $139 |
Camera comparison
Infinix GT 50 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Infinix GT 50 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1208x2644
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Infinix GT 50 Pro
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 30W
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Infinix GT 50 Pro and Lava Blaze Amoled 2, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Infinix GT 50 Pro leads Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by 182.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $210. Lava Blaze Amoled 2 was $210 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (76/100 vs 51/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro is a bit better (92/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro and the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 are nearly equal (34/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (69/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Infinix GT 50 Pro (79/100 vs 60/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Infinix GT 50 Pro or the Lava Blaze Amoled 2?
The Infinix GT 50 Pro is noticeably better than the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Infinix GT 50 Pro and the Lava Blaze Amoled 2?
The Infinix GT 50 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 — 50/100.
Which is more powerful: the Infinix GT 50 Pro or the Lava Blaze Amoled 2?
The Infinix GT 50 Pro leads on performance (76/100 vs 51/100).
Should you choose the Infinix GT 50 Pro over the Lava Blaze Amoled 2?
The Infinix GT 50 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.