Infinix GT 50 Pro vs Poco F6
The Infinix GT 50 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultimate, while the Poco F6 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; estimated prices are $349 and $350. By overall MobileRank rating, the Infinix GT 50 Pro leads — 66/100 vs 63/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Infinix GT 50 Pro has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5000); the Infinix GT 50 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (2,137,843 vs 1,718,632); the Poco F6 is noticeably lighter (179g vs 200g).
Infinix GT 50 Pro
Poco F6
- Higher AnTuTu: 2137843 vs 1718632
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6100 vs 5017
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5000 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Cheaper: $349 vs $350
- Higher performance (77/100 vs 74/100)
- Longer battery life (69/100 vs 58/100)
- Better display (92/100 vs 83/100)
- Better Geekbench Single: 1930 vs 1579
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Lighter: 179g vs 200g
- Better camera (37/100 vs 34/100)
- Better portability (72/100 vs 60/100)
Comparing the Infinix GT 50 Pro vs the Poco F6, the Infinix GT 50 Pro scores 3 points higher (66/100 vs 63/100). In the "battery" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro leads (69/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro and the Poco F6 are nearly equal (77/100 vs 74/100). In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro is a bit better (92/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F6 and the Infinix GT 50 Pro are nearly equal (37/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro is a bit better (69/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco F6 is a bit better (72/100 vs 60/100).
| Specification | Infinix GT 50 Pro | Poco F6 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultimate | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | |
| AnTuTu | 2137843 | 1718632 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1579 | 1930 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6100 | 5017 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1208x2644 | 2712x1220 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 14 / HyperOS | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 2400 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | — | 160.5×74.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 200 g | 179 g | |
| Price | $349 | $350 |
Infinix GT 50 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Poco F6
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Infinix GT 50 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1208x2644
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Poco F6
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2712x1220
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Infinix GT 50 Pro
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 30W
Poco F6
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
We compared Infinix GT 50 Pro and Poco F6, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Infinix GT 50 Pro leads Poco F6 by 24.4% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $1. Infinix GT 50 Pro is cheaper by $1.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro and the Poco F6 are nearly equal (77/100 vs 74/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro is a bit better (92/100 vs 83/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco F6 and the Infinix GT 50 Pro are nearly equal (37/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro is a bit better (69/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco F6 is a bit better (72/100 vs 60/100).
Which is better: the Infinix GT 50 Pro or the Poco F6?
The Infinix GT 50 Pro edges out the Poco F6 by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Infinix GT 50 Pro and the Poco F6?
The Infinix GT 50 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the Poco F6 — 63/100.
Should you choose the Infinix GT 50 Pro over the Poco F6?
The Infinix GT 50 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Poco F6 is a better fit for active users.