Infinix GT 30 Pro vs Poco F6
The Infinix GT 30 Pro (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate, while the Poco F6 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3. By overall MobileRank rating, the Infinix GT 30 Pro leads — 65/100 vs 63/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Infinix GT 30 Pro has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 108 MP vs 50 MP; the Infinix GT 30 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (1,757,190 vs 1,718,632).
Infinix GT 30 Pro
Poco F6
- Higher AnTuTu: 1757190 vs 1718632
- Bigger battery: 5200 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Better camera (43/100 vs 37/100)
- Longer battery life (64/100 vs 58/100)
- Better display (93/100 vs 83/100)
- Better Geekbench Single: 1930 vs 1398
- Better Geekbench Multi: 5017 vs 4313
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Lighter: 179g vs 189g
- Higher performance (74/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (72/100 vs 66/100)
Comparing the Infinix GT 30 Pro vs the Poco F6, the Infinix GT 30 Pro scores 2 points higher (65/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F6 and the Infinix GT 30 Pro are nearly equal (74/100 vs 70/100). In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 30 Pro is a bit better (93/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Infinix GT 30 Pro is a bit better (43/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Infinix GT 30 Pro is a bit better (64/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco F6 is a bit better (72/100 vs 66/100).
| Specification | Infinix GT 30 Pro | Poco F6 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | |
| AnTuTu | 1757190 | 1718632 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1398 | 1930 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4313 | 5017 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2720 | 2712x1220 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades, XOS 15 | Android 14 / HyperOS | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 2400 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 163.7×75.8×8.0 mm | 160.5×74.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 179 g | |
| Price | — | $350 |
Infinix GT 30 Pro
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Poco F6
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Infinix GT 30 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2720
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Poco F6
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2712x1220
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Infinix GT 30 Pro
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 30W
Poco F6
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
We compared Infinix GT 30 Pro and Poco F6, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Infinix GT 30 Pro leads Poco F6 by 2.2% in our overall performance rating.
Infinix GT 30 Pro
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Poco F6 and the Infinix GT 30 Pro are nearly equal (74/100 vs 70/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 30 Pro is a bit better (93/100 vs 83/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Infinix GT 30 Pro is a bit better (43/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Infinix GT 30 Pro is a bit better (64/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco F6 is a bit better (72/100 vs 66/100).
Which is better: the Infinix GT 30 Pro or the Poco F6?
The Infinix GT 30 Pro edges out the Poco F6 by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Infinix GT 30 Pro and the Poco F6?
The Infinix GT 30 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Poco F6 — 63/100.
Which has the better camera: the Infinix GT 30 Pro or the Poco F6?
The Infinix GT 30 Pro leads on camera score (43/100 vs 37/100).
Should you choose the Infinix GT 30 Pro over the Poco F6?
The Infinix GT 30 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Poco F6 is a better fit for active users.