Infinix GT 50 Pro vs Poco C55
The Infinix GT 50 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultimate, while the Poco C55 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85. By overall MobileRank rating, the Infinix GT 50 Pro leads — 65/100 vs 35/100 (a 30-point difference). Key differences: the Infinix GT 50 Pro has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5000); the Infinix GT 50 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (1,946,644 vs 346,495); the Infinix GT 50 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Poco C55 doesn't.
Infinix GT 50 Pro
Poco C55
- Higher AnTuTu: 1946644 vs 346495
- Better Geekbench Single: 1579 vs 420
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6100 vs 1364
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 10W
- Higher performance (76/100 vs 29/100)
- Longer battery life (69/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (92/100 vs 39/100)
- Better portability (60/100 vs 56/100)
- Lighter: 192g vs 200g
- Overall rating 35/100
Comparing the Infinix GT 50 Pro vs the Poco C55, the Infinix GT 50 Pro scores 30 points higher (65/100 vs 35/100). In the "performance" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro leads (76/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro leads (69/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C55 (76/100 vs 29/100). In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C55 (92/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro notably outperforms the Poco C55 (69/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro and the Poco C55 are nearly equal (60/100 vs 56/100).
| Specification | Infinix GT 50 Pro | Poco C55 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultimate | MediaTek Helio G85 | |
| AnTuTu | 1946644 | 346495 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1579 | 420 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6100 | 1364 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.7" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1208x2644 | 720x1650 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 10W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | — | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 4GB / 6GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP64 | — | |
| Dimensions | — | 168.8×76.4×8.8 mm | |
| Weight | 200 g | 192 g | |
| Launch price | $349 | — |
Infinix GT 50 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Poco C55
- Main: —
- Front: 5MP
Infinix GT 50 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1208x2644
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Poco C55
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1650
- Refresh rate: —
Infinix GT 50 Pro
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 30W
Poco C55
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
We compared Infinix GT 50 Pro and Poco C55, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Infinix GT 50 Pro leads Poco C55 by 461.8% in our overall performance rating.
Poco C55
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C55 (76/100 vs 29/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C55 (92/100 vs 39/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro notably outperforms the Poco C55 (69/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro and the Poco C55 are nearly equal (60/100 vs 56/100).
Which is better: the Infinix GT 50 Pro or the Poco C55?
The Infinix GT 50 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C55 by 30 points (65/100 vs 35/100).
What is the rating of the Infinix GT 50 Pro and the Poco C55?
The Infinix GT 50 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Poco C55 — 35/100.
Which is more powerful: the Infinix GT 50 Pro or the Poco C55?
The Infinix GT 50 Pro leads on performance (76/100 vs 29/100).
Should you choose the Infinix GT 50 Pro over the Poco C55?
The Infinix GT 50 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Poco C55 is a better fit for everyday use.