Infinix GT 50 Pro vs Poco C51
The Infinix GT 50 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultimate, while the Poco C51 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G36. By overall MobileRank rating, the Infinix GT 50 Pro leads — 65/100 vs 26/100 (a 39-point difference). Key differences: the Infinix GT 50 Pro has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5000); the Infinix GT 50 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (1,946,644 vs 195,539); the Infinix GT 50 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Poco C51 doesn't.
Infinix GT 50 Pro
Poco C51
- Higher AnTuTu: 1946644 vs 195539
- Better Geekbench Single: 1579 vs 189
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6100 vs 781
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 10W
- Higher performance (76/100 vs 11/100)
- Longer battery life (69/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (92/100 vs 39/100)
- Better portability (60/100 vs 52/100)
- Lighter: 192g vs 200g
- Overall rating 26/100
Comparing the Infinix GT 50 Pro vs the Poco C51, the Infinix GT 50 Pro scores 39 points higher (65/100 vs 26/100). In the "performance" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro leads (76/100 vs 11/100). In the "battery" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro leads (69/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C51 (76/100 vs 11/100). In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C51 (92/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro notably outperforms the Poco C51 (69/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro is a bit better (60/100 vs 52/100).
| Specification | Infinix GT 50 Pro | Poco C51 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultimate | MediaTek Helio G36 | |
| AnTuTu | 1946644 | 195539 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1579 | 189 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6100 | 781 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1208x2644 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 10W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | — | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 64GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 13 (Go edition), MIUI | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 400 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP64 | — | |
| Dimensions | — | 164.9×76.8×9.1 mm | |
| Weight | 200 g | 192 g | |
| Launch price | $349 | — |
Infinix GT 50 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Poco C51
- Main: —
- Front: 5MP
Infinix GT 50 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1208x2644
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Poco C51
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Infinix GT 50 Pro
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 30W
Poco C51
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
We compared Infinix GT 50 Pro and Poco C51, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Infinix GT 50 Pro leads Poco C51 by 895.5% in our overall performance rating.
Poco C51
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C51 (76/100 vs 11/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C51 (92/100 vs 39/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro notably outperforms the Poco C51 (69/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Infinix GT 50 Pro is a bit better (60/100 vs 52/100).
Which is better: the Infinix GT 50 Pro or the Poco C51?
The Infinix GT 50 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C51 by 39 points (65/100 vs 26/100).
What is the rating of the Infinix GT 50 Pro and the Poco C51?
The Infinix GT 50 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Poco C51 — 26/100.
Which is more powerful: the Infinix GT 50 Pro or the Poco C51?
The Infinix GT 50 Pro leads on performance (76/100 vs 11/100).
Should you choose the Infinix GT 50 Pro over the Poco C51?
The Infinix GT 50 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Poco C51 is a better fit for everyday use.