Huawei Maimang 10 SE 5G vs Vivo Y32t
The Huawei Maimang 10 SE 5G (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Huawei Maimang 10 SE 5G leads — 32/100 vs 28/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Huawei Maimang 10 SE 5G is faster in AnTuTu (435,710 vs 303,398); the Vivo Y32t is noticeably lighter (179g vs 198g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Huawei Maimang 10 SE 5G
Vivo Y32t
What makes Huawei Maimang 10 SE 5G better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 435710 vs 303398
- Better Geekbench Single: 689 vs 341
- Better Geekbench Multi: 1597 vs 779
- Higher performance (38/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Vivo Y32t better?
- Lighter: 179g vs 198g
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 43/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 51/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Huawei Maimang 10 SE 5G vs the Vivo Y32t, the Huawei Maimang 10 SE 5G scores 4 points higher (32/100 vs 28/100). In the "performance" category, the Huawei Maimang 10 SE 5G leads (38/100 vs 20/100). In the "performance" category, the Huawei Maimang 10 SE 5G notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (38/100 vs 20/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 39/100. In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Huawei Maimang 10 SE 5G (68/100 vs 51/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Huawei Maimang 10 SE 5G | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 435710 | 303398 | |
| Geekbench Single | 689 | 341 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1597 | 779 | |
| Display | 6.5" LCD IPS | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | — | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 5W | — | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | — | — | |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | HarmonyOS 2 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 163.9×75.8×8.9 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 198 g | 179 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Huawei Maimang 10 SE 5G
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Huawei Maimang 10 SE 5G
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Huawei Maimang 10 SE 5G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Huawei Maimang 10 SE 5G and Vivo Y32t, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Huawei Maimang 10 SE 5G leads Vivo Y32t by 43.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Huawei Maimang 10 SE 5G notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (38/100 vs 20/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 39/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Huawei Maimang 10 SE 5G (68/100 vs 51/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Huawei Maimang 10 SE 5G or the Vivo Y32t?
The Huawei Maimang 10 SE 5G edges out the Vivo Y32t by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Huawei Maimang 10 SE 5G and the Vivo Y32t?
The Huawei Maimang 10 SE 5G has a MobileRank rating of 32/100, the Vivo Y32t — 28/100.
Which is more powerful: the Huawei Maimang 10 SE 5G or the Vivo Y32t?
The Huawei Maimang 10 SE 5G leads on performance (38/100 vs 20/100).
Should you choose the Huawei Maimang 10 SE 5G over the Vivo Y32t?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is performance — better on the Huawei Maimang 10 SE 5G (38/100 vs 20/100).