Huawei Enjoy 20e vs Vivo Y32t

The Huawei Enjoy 20e (2021) runs on the MediaTek Helio P35, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y32t leads — 28/100 vs 25/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y32t is faster in AnTuTu (303,398 vs 199,111).

The Vivo Y32t edges out the Huawei Enjoy 20e by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Huawei Enjoy 20e

Performance 19
Display 40
Camera 10
Battery 43
Portability 57
Value for money —

Vivo Y32t

Performance 20
Display 39
Camera 10
Battery 52
Portability 68
Value for money —

What makes Huawei Enjoy 20e better?

  • Better Geekbench Single: 476 vs 341
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 828 vs 779

  • Better display (40/100 vs 39/100)

What makes Vivo Y32t better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 303398 vs 199111
  • Lighter: 179g vs 185g

  • Higher performance (20/100 vs 19/100)
  • Longer battery life (52/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better portability (68/100 vs 57/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Huawei Enjoy 20e vs the Vivo Y32t, the Vivo Y32t scores 3 points higher (28/100 vs 25/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y32t and the Huawei Enjoy 20e are nearly equal (20/100 vs 19/100). In the "display" category, the Huawei Enjoy 20e and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (40/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (68/100 vs 57/100).

Specs comparison

Specification Huawei Enjoy 20e Vivo Y32t
Processor MediaTek Helio P35 MediaTek Helio P70 ()
AnTuTu 199111 303398
Geekbench Single 476 341
Geekbench Multi 828 779
Display 6.3" LCD IPS 6.5" LCD IPS
Resolution 720x1600 720x1600
Refresh rate — —
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 10W —
Main camera 13 MP 13 MP
Front camera 8 MP 8 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB —
Storage 64GB / 128GB 128GB / 256GB
OS HarmonyOS 2.0 (China), EMUI 10.1 (International), no Google Play Services Android 11 Red Velvet Cake
NFC no no
Dimensions 159.1×74.1×9.0 mm 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm
Weight 185 g 179 g
Launch price — —

Camera comparison

Huawei Enjoy 20e

  • Main: 13MP f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
10
camera

Vivo Y32t

  • Main: 13MP
  • Front: 8MP
10
camera

Display comparison

Huawei Enjoy 20e

  • 6.3" LCD IPS
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: —
40
display

Vivo Y32t

  • 6.5" LCD IPS
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: —
39
display

Battery and charging

Huawei Enjoy 20e

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 10W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery

Vivo Y32t

  • 5000 mAh
  • No wireless charging
52
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Huawei Enjoy 20e and Vivo Y32t, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Huawei Enjoy 20e MediaTek Helio P35
25/100
199111 AnTuTu
Vivo Y32t MediaTek Helio P70 ()
28/100 +34.4%
303398 AnTuTu

Vivo Y32t leads Huawei Enjoy 20e by 34.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y32t and the Huawei Enjoy 20e are nearly equal (20/100 vs 19/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Huawei Enjoy 20e and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (40/100 vs 39/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100.

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (68/100 vs 57/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Huawei Enjoy 20e or the Vivo Y32t?

The Vivo Y32t edges out the Huawei Enjoy 20e by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Huawei Enjoy 20e and the Vivo Y32t?

The Huawei Enjoy 20e has a MobileRank rating of 25/100, the Vivo Y32t — 28/100.

Should you choose the Huawei Enjoy 20e over the Vivo Y32t?

Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is portability — better on the Vivo Y32t (68/100 vs 57/100).