Honor X40 GT vs Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
The Honor X40 GT (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, while the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 1300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor X40 GT leads — 54/100 vs 51/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4800); the Honor X40 GT is faster in AnTuTu (1,135,878 vs 954,090); the Honor X40 GT has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor X40 GT
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
What makes Honor X40 GT better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 1135878 vs 954090
- Better Geekbench Single: 1500 vs 1114
- Better Geekbench Multi: 3537 vs 3281
- Faster charging: 66W vs 44W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 203g
- Higher performance (64/100 vs 58/100)
- Better display (75/100 vs 66/100)
- Better portability (54/100 vs 44/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) better?
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4800 mAh
- Longer battery life (56/100 vs 49/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor X40 GT vs the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022), the Honor X40 GT scores 3 points higher (54/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor X40 GT is a bit better (64/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT is a bit better (75/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 32/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) is a bit better (56/100 vs 49/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor X40 GT is a bit better (54/100 vs 44/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor X40 GT | Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G | MediaTek Dimensity 1300 | |
| AnTuTu | 1135878 | 954090 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1500 | 1114 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3537 | 3281 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2408 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 44W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 12, Magic UI 6.1 | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 163.9×75.3×9.2 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 203 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Honor X40 GT
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Honor X40 GT
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor X40 GT
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Honor X40 GT and Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor X40 GT leads Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) by 19.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Honor X40 GT is a bit better (64/100 vs 58/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT is a bit better (75/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 32/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) is a bit better (56/100 vs 49/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor X40 GT is a bit better (54/100 vs 44/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT or the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)?
The Honor X40 GT edges out the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT and the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)?
The Honor X40 GT has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) — 51/100.
Which is more powerful: the Honor X40 GT or the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)?
The Honor X40 GT leads on performance (64/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT over the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)?
The Honor X40 GT is a better fit for active users.