Honor X40 GT Racing vs ZTE Blade V40 Pro
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the ZTE Blade V40 Pro (2022) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads — 30/100 vs 22/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Blade V40 Pro has the bigger battery (5100 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Honor X40 GT Racing has NFC for contactless payments, the ZTE Blade V40 Pro doesn't.
Honor X40 GT Racing
ZTE Blade V40 Pro
- Faster charging: 66W vs 65W
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Bigger battery: 5100 vs 4800 mAh
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 190g vs 199g
- Better camera (37/100 vs 27/100)
- Longer battery life (50/100 vs 43/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (62/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the ZTE Blade V40 Pro, the Honor X40 GT Racing scores 8 points higher (30/100 vs 22/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Blade V40 Pro leads (37/100 vs 27/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade V40 Pro (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Blade V40 Pro is a bit better (37/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Blade V40 Pro is a bit better (50/100 vs 43/100). In the "design" category, the ZTE Blade V40 Pro is a bit better (62/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | ZTE Blade V40 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Unisoc Tiger T618 | |
| AnTuTu | — | — | |
| Geekbench Single | — | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | — | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5100 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 65W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 6GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 11 | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 163.9×76.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 190 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
ZTE Blade V40 Pro
- Main: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
ZTE Blade V40 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade V40 Pro
- 5100 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade V40 Pro (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Blade V40 Pro is a bit better (37/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Blade V40 Pro is a bit better (50/100 vs 43/100).
design
In the "design" category, the ZTE Blade V40 Pro is a bit better (62/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the ZTE Blade V40 Pro?
The Honor X40 GT Racing edges out the ZTE Blade V40 Pro by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the ZTE Blade V40 Pro?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the ZTE Blade V40 Pro — 22/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the ZTE Blade V40 Pro?
The ZTE Blade V40 Pro leads on camera score (37/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the ZTE Blade V40 Pro?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Blade V40 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.