Honor X40 GT Racing vs ZTE Blade A76 4G
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the ZTE Blade A76 4G (2025) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads — 30/100 vs 25/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Blade A76 4G has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4800); the Honor X40 GT Racing has NFC for contactless payments, the ZTE Blade A76 4G doesn't.
Honor X40 GT Racing
ZTE Blade A76 4G
- Faster charging: 66W vs 5W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz
- Better camera (27/100 vs 24/100)
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 50/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4800 mAh
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the ZTE Blade A76 4G, the Honor X40 GT Racing scores 5 points higher (30/100 vs 25/100). In the "value for money" category, the ZTE Blade A76 4G leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A76 4G (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the ZTE Blade A76 4G are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (43/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the ZTE Blade A76 4G are nearly equal (51/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, the ZTE Blade A76 4G significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (100/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | ZTE Blade A76 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | — | |
| AnTuTu | — | — | |
| Geekbench Single | — | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | — | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 720x1612 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 5W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | — | |
| RAM | 12GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 15 | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | — | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | — | |
| Weight | 199 g | — | |
| Price | — | $105 |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
ZTE Blade A76 4G
- Main: 50MP
- Front: —
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
ZTE Blade A76 4G
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade A76 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
Honor X40 GT Racing
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A76 4G (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the ZTE Blade A76 4G are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (43/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the ZTE Blade A76 4G are nearly equal (51/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the ZTE Blade A76 4G significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (100/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the ZTE Blade A76 4G?
The Honor X40 GT Racing edges out the ZTE Blade A76 4G by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the ZTE Blade A76 4G?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the ZTE Blade A76 4G — 25/100.
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the ZTE Blade A76 4G?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Blade A76 4G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.