Honor X40 GT Racing vs ZTE Axon 11 4G
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the ZTE Axon 11 4G (2020) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads — 30/100 vs 16/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the Honor X40 GT Racing has the bigger battery (4800 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 48 MP; the ZTE Axon 11 4G is noticeably lighter (168g vs 199g).
Honor X40 GT Racing
ZTE Axon 11 4G
- Bigger battery: 4800 vs 4000 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 12/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Lighter: 168g vs 199g
- Better camera (31/100 vs 27/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (90/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the ZTE Axon 11 4G, the Honor X40 GT Racing scores 14 points higher (30/100 vs 16/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads (43/100 vs 12/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 11 4G (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 11 4G and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (31/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 11 4G (43/100 vs 12/100). In the "design" category, the ZTE Axon 11 4G significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (90/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | ZTE Axon 11 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Helio P70 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 303398 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 341 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 779 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.5" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 4000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 6GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 10, MiFavor 10 | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 159.2×73.4×7.9 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 168 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
ZTE Axon 11 4G
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
ZTE Axon 11 4G
- 6.5" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: —
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 11 4G
- 4000 mAh
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 11 4G (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 11 4G and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (31/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 11 4G (43/100 vs 12/100).
design
In the "design" category, the ZTE Axon 11 4G significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (90/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the ZTE Axon 11 4G?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is noticeably better than the ZTE Axon 11 4G — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the ZTE Axon 11 4G?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the ZTE Axon 11 4G — 16/100.
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the ZTE Axon 11 4G?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 11 4G is a better fit for everyday use.