Honor X40 GT Racing vs Vivo Y300 Pro
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Vivo Y300 Pro (2024) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y300 Pro leads — 35/100 vs 30/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y300 Pro has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 4800); the Honor X40 GT Racing has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y300 Pro doesn't.
Honor X40 GT Racing
Vivo Y300 Pro
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Overall rating 30/100
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 4800 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 66W
- Lighter: 194g vs 199g
- Better camera (34/100 vs 27/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 43/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (57/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Vivo Y300 Pro, the Vivo Y300 Pro scores 5 points higher (35/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y300 Pro leads (63/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y300 Pro is a bit better (34/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y300 Pro notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (63/100 vs 43/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y300 Pro is a bit better (57/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Vivo Y300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 736675 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 935 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 2719 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2392 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 14, OriginOS 4 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 5000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | — | IP65 | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 163.4×76.4×7.7 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 194 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Vivo Y300 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 32MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo Y300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2392
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y300 Pro
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y300 Pro is a bit better (34/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y300 Pro notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (63/100 vs 43/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y300 Pro is a bit better (57/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Vivo Y300 Pro?
The Vivo Y300 Pro edges out the Honor X40 GT Racing by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Vivo Y300 Pro?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Vivo Y300 Pro — 35/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Vivo Y300 Pro?
The Vivo Y300 Pro leads on camera score (34/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Vivo Y300 Pro?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo Y300 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.