Honor X40 GT Racing vs Vivo Y300 (China)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Vivo Y300 (China) (2024) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y300 (China) leads — 31/100 vs 30/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y300 (China) has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 4800); the Honor X40 GT Racing has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y300 (China) doesn't.
Honor X40 GT Racing
Vivo Y300 (China)
- Faster charging: 66W vs 44W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 200g
- Better camera (27/100 vs 24/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 50/100)
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 4800 mAh
- Longer battery life (54/100 vs 43/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Vivo Y300 (China), the Vivo Y300 (China) scores 1 points higher (31/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y300 (China) leads (54/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Vivo Y300 (China) are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y300 (China) is a bit better (54/100 vs 43/100). In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Vivo Y300 (China) are nearly equal (51/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Vivo Y300 (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 524785 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 771 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1980 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2392 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 44W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 15, OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1800 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | — | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 163.6×76.2×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 200 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Vivo Y300 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo Y300 (China)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2392
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y300 (China)
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Vivo Y300 (China) are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y300 (China) is a bit better (54/100 vs 43/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Vivo Y300 (China) are nearly equal (51/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Vivo Y300 (China) edges out the Honor X40 GT Racing by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Vivo Y300 (China) — 31/100.
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo Y300 (China) is a better fit for everyday use.