Honor X40 GT Racing vs Vivo T2x (India)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Vivo T2x (India) (2023) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads — 30/100 vs 17/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo T2x (India) has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4800); the Honor X40 GT Racing has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo T2x (India) doesn't; the Vivo T2x (India) is noticeably lighter (184g vs 199g).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Vivo T2x (India)
- Faster charging: 66W vs 18W
- Better camera (27/100 vs 24/100)
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4800 mAh
- Lighter: 184g vs 199g
- Better design/ergonomics (70/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Vivo T2x (India), the Honor X40 GT Racing scores 13 points higher (30/100 vs 17/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Vivo T2x (India) (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Vivo T2x (India) are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (43/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo T2x (India) notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (70/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Vivo T2x (India) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Dimensity 6020 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 524785 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 771 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1980 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2408 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 18W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 164.1×75.6×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 184 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Vivo T2x (India)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo T2x (India)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: —
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Vivo T2x (India)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Vivo T2x (India) (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Vivo T2x (India) are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (43/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo T2x (India) notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (70/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Vivo T2x (India)?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is noticeably better than the Vivo T2x (India) — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Vivo T2x (India)?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Vivo T2x (India) — 17/100.
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Vivo T2x (India)?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo T2x (India) is a better fit for everyday use.