Honor X40 GT Racing vs Vivo T2 (India)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Vivo T2 (India) (2023) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads — 30/100 vs 26/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Honor X40 GT Racing has the bigger battery (4800 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Honor X40 GT Racing has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo T2 (India) doesn't; the Vivo T2 (India) is noticeably lighter (172g vs 199g).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Vivo T2 (India)
- Bigger battery: 4800 vs 4500 mAh
- Faster charging: 66W vs 44W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 30/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 172g vs 199g
- Better camera (37/100 vs 27/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (85/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Vivo T2 (India), the Honor X40 GT Racing scores 4 points higher (30/100 vs 26/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo T2 (India) leads (37/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads (43/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Vivo T2 (India) (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo T2 (India) is a bit better (37/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (43/100 vs 30/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo T2 (India) significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (85/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Vivo T2 (India) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G | |
| AnTuTu | — | 592015 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 905 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 2003 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.4" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 44W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 158.9×73.5×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 172 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Vivo T2 (India)
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo T2 (India)
- 6.4" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Vivo T2 (India)
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Vivo T2 (India) (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo T2 (India) is a bit better (37/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (43/100 vs 30/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo T2 (India) significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (85/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Vivo T2 (India)?
The Honor X40 GT Racing edges out the Vivo T2 (India) by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Vivo T2 (India)?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Vivo T2 (India) — 26/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Vivo T2 (India)?
The Vivo T2 (India) leads on camera score (37/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Vivo T2 (India)?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo T2 (India) is a better fit for everyday use.